TY - JOUR
T1 - Problems in the fingerprints based polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons source apportionment analysis and a practical solution
AU - Zou, Yonghong
AU - Wang, Lixia
AU - Christensen, Erik R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the ISTC Hazardous Waste Research Fund (SR2). Special appreciation goes to John Marlin for providing the PAH data and for his very helpful discussions. We also thank Monica Mingioni and Lindsay Donovan for their assistance with data entry, figure and table preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2015/7/28
Y1 - 2015/7/28
N2 - This work intended to explain the challenges of the fingerprints based source apportionment method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in the aquatic environment, and to illustrate a practical and robust solution. The PAH data detected in the sediment cores from the Illinois River provide the basis of this study. Principal component analysis (PCA) separates PAH compounds into two groups reflecting their possible airborne transport patterns; but it is not able to suggest specific sources. Not all positive matrix factorization (PMF) determined sources are distinguishable due to the variability of source fingerprints. However, they constitute useful suggestions for inputs for a Bayesian chemical mass balance (CMB) analysis. The Bayesian CMB analysis takes into account the measurement errors as well as the variations of source fingerprints, and provides a credible source apportionment. Major PAH sources for Illinois River sediments are traffic (35%), coke oven (24%), coal combustion (18%), and wood combustion (14%). 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
AB - This work intended to explain the challenges of the fingerprints based source apportionment method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in the aquatic environment, and to illustrate a practical and robust solution. The PAH data detected in the sediment cores from the Illinois River provide the basis of this study. Principal component analysis (PCA) separates PAH compounds into two groups reflecting their possible airborne transport patterns; but it is not able to suggest specific sources. Not all positive matrix factorization (PMF) determined sources are distinguishable due to the variability of source fingerprints. However, they constitute useful suggestions for inputs for a Bayesian chemical mass balance (CMB) analysis. The Bayesian CMB analysis takes into account the measurement errors as well as the variations of source fingerprints, and provides a credible source apportionment. Major PAH sources for Illinois River sediments are traffic (35%), coke oven (24%), coal combustion (18%), and wood combustion (14%). 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
KW - ISTC
KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
KW - Fingerprints
KW - Source apportionment analysis
KW - Bayesian
KW - Positive matrix factorization (PMF)
KW - Principal component analysis (PCA)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938117998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938117998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.029
DO - 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 26208321
VL - 205
SP - 394
EP - 402
JO - Environmental Pollution
JF - Environmental Pollution
M1 - 7968
ER -