Probability models to assess the seismic safety of rigid block-like structures and the effectiveness of two safety devices

Alessandro Contento, Paolo Gardoni, Angelo Di Egidio, Andrea M. De Leo

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

When subject to earthquakes, some objects and structures, such as statues, obelisks, storage systems, and transformers, show a dynamic behavior that can be modeled considering the object/structure as a rigid block. Several papers have studied the dynamic behavior of both stand-alone rigid blocks and systems where rigid blocks have been paired with safety devices to prevent or delay the overturning of the blocks. Although the safety devices have generally been proven to be effective, their effectiveness changes substantially varying the parameters that characterize the system and the seismic input. This paper compares the seismic responses of stand along rigid blocks with those of blocks coupled with two candidate safety devices: an isolating base and a pendulum mass damper. To account for the relevant uncertainties, probabilistic seismic demand models are developed using a Bayesian approach. The probabilistic models are then used along with the overturning capacities of the blocks to construct fragility curves that give a prediction of the probability of overturning occurrence as a function of some characteristics of the blocks, of the safety devices, as well as of the seismic excitation, i.e. the slenderness of the body and the peak ground acceleration. The data needed to develop the probabilistic model are obtained integrating the nonlinear equations of motion of the two systems subject to selected ground motions. In the end, some numerical examples are proposed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1164-1169
Number of pages6
JournalProcedia Engineering
Volume199
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Event10th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2017 - Rome, Italy
Duration: Sep 10 2017Sep 13 2017

Fingerprint

Safety devices
Seismic response
Pendulums
Nonlinear equations
Equations of motion
Earthquakes
Statistical Models

Keywords

  • Rigid block
  • failure probability
  • logistic regression
  • probabilistic models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Probability models to assess the seismic safety of rigid block-like structures and the effectiveness of two safety devices. / Contento, Alessandro; Gardoni, Paolo; Egidio, Angelo Di; De Leo, Andrea M.

In: Procedia Engineering, Vol. 199, 01.01.2017, p. 1164-1169.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{d3af34d6ada24e02a26f580820077174,
title = "Probability models to assess the seismic safety of rigid block-like structures and the effectiveness of two safety devices",
abstract = "When subject to earthquakes, some objects and structures, such as statues, obelisks, storage systems, and transformers, show a dynamic behavior that can be modeled considering the object/structure as a rigid block. Several papers have studied the dynamic behavior of both stand-alone rigid blocks and systems where rigid blocks have been paired with safety devices to prevent or delay the overturning of the blocks. Although the safety devices have generally been proven to be effective, their effectiveness changes substantially varying the parameters that characterize the system and the seismic input. This paper compares the seismic responses of stand along rigid blocks with those of blocks coupled with two candidate safety devices: an isolating base and a pendulum mass damper. To account for the relevant uncertainties, probabilistic seismic demand models are developed using a Bayesian approach. The probabilistic models are then used along with the overturning capacities of the blocks to construct fragility curves that give a prediction of the probability of overturning occurrence as a function of some characteristics of the blocks, of the safety devices, as well as of the seismic excitation, i.e. the slenderness of the body and the peak ground acceleration. The data needed to develop the probabilistic model are obtained integrating the nonlinear equations of motion of the two systems subject to selected ground motions. In the end, some numerical examples are proposed.",
keywords = "Rigid block, failure probability, logistic regression, probabilistic models",
author = "Alessandro Contento and Paolo Gardoni and Egidio, {Angelo Di} and {De Leo}, {Andrea M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "199",
pages = "1164--1169",
journal = "Procedia Engineering",
issn = "1877-7058",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probability models to assess the seismic safety of rigid block-like structures and the effectiveness of two safety devices

AU - Contento, Alessandro

AU - Gardoni, Paolo

AU - Egidio, Angelo Di

AU - De Leo, Andrea M.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - When subject to earthquakes, some objects and structures, such as statues, obelisks, storage systems, and transformers, show a dynamic behavior that can be modeled considering the object/structure as a rigid block. Several papers have studied the dynamic behavior of both stand-alone rigid blocks and systems where rigid blocks have been paired with safety devices to prevent or delay the overturning of the blocks. Although the safety devices have generally been proven to be effective, their effectiveness changes substantially varying the parameters that characterize the system and the seismic input. This paper compares the seismic responses of stand along rigid blocks with those of blocks coupled with two candidate safety devices: an isolating base and a pendulum mass damper. To account for the relevant uncertainties, probabilistic seismic demand models are developed using a Bayesian approach. The probabilistic models are then used along with the overturning capacities of the blocks to construct fragility curves that give a prediction of the probability of overturning occurrence as a function of some characteristics of the blocks, of the safety devices, as well as of the seismic excitation, i.e. the slenderness of the body and the peak ground acceleration. The data needed to develop the probabilistic model are obtained integrating the nonlinear equations of motion of the two systems subject to selected ground motions. In the end, some numerical examples are proposed.

AB - When subject to earthquakes, some objects and structures, such as statues, obelisks, storage systems, and transformers, show a dynamic behavior that can be modeled considering the object/structure as a rigid block. Several papers have studied the dynamic behavior of both stand-alone rigid blocks and systems where rigid blocks have been paired with safety devices to prevent or delay the overturning of the blocks. Although the safety devices have generally been proven to be effective, their effectiveness changes substantially varying the parameters that characterize the system and the seismic input. This paper compares the seismic responses of stand along rigid blocks with those of blocks coupled with two candidate safety devices: an isolating base and a pendulum mass damper. To account for the relevant uncertainties, probabilistic seismic demand models are developed using a Bayesian approach. The probabilistic models are then used along with the overturning capacities of the blocks to construct fragility curves that give a prediction of the probability of overturning occurrence as a function of some characteristics of the blocks, of the safety devices, as well as of the seismic excitation, i.e. the slenderness of the body and the peak ground acceleration. The data needed to develop the probabilistic model are obtained integrating the nonlinear equations of motion of the two systems subject to selected ground motions. In the end, some numerical examples are proposed.

KW - Rigid block

KW - failure probability

KW - logistic regression

KW - probabilistic models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029894269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029894269&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.312

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.312

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85029894269

VL - 199

SP - 1164

EP - 1169

JO - Procedia Engineering

JF - Procedia Engineering

SN - 1877-7058

ER -