Probabilistic enrichment of knowledge graph entities for relation detection in conversational understanding

Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Asli Celikyilmaz, Larry Heck, Gokhan Tur, Geoff Zweig

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

Knowledge encoded in semantic graphs such as Freebase has been shown to benefit semantic parsing and interpretation of natural language user utterances. In this paper, we propose new methods to assign weights to semantic graphs that reflect common usage types of the entities and their relations. Such statistical information can improve the disambiguation of entities in natural language utterances. Weights for entity types can be derived from the populated knowledge in the semantic graph, based on the frequency of occurrence of each type. They can also be learned from the usage frequencies in real world natural language text, such as related Wikipedia documents or user queries posed to a search engine. We compare the proposed methods with the unweighted version of the semantic knowledge graph for the relation detection task and show that all weighting methods result in better performance in comparison to using the unweighted version.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2113-2117
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH
StatePublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association: Celebrating the Diversity of Spoken Languages, INTERSPEECH 2014 - Singapore, Singapore
Duration: Sep 14 2014Sep 18 2014

Keywords

  • Entity types
  • Relation detection
  • Semantic knowledge graphs
  • Spoken dialog systems
  • Spoken language understanding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Signal Processing
  • Software
  • Modeling and Simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Probabilistic enrichment of knowledge graph entities for relation detection in conversational understanding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this