Privatization of wrongful dismissal protection in comparative perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The US Supreme Court has allowed employers to sweep employee claims of violation of most labour protective law into arbitration systems that employers unilaterally establish. The law would not allow employers in the UK, France or Germany to do so. This essay explores how and why that is so in each of these countries. It explains the US exceptionalism by reference to public choice theory, ie, by resort to the economics of judicial shirking.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-168
Number of pages20
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Privatization of wrongful dismissal protection in comparative perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this