Abstract
Fewer companies are going public in the United States, but public companies are still the focus of securities law and enforcement. A major exception is that anti-fraud provisions apply to all companies, public or private. Theranos is a prominent example. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued this private company for securities fraud. This article examines one societal cost of the decline of public companies: the loss of information needed to detect and punish fraud. It analyzes the SEC’s securities fraud enforcements against private companies and assesses the information costs of moving to an anti-fraud-only regime. It concludes by identifying ways to incentivize information disclosure in the newly private universe of corporations, including a proposal to expand whistleblower protection for employees of private companies.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 663 |
Journal | UC Davis Law Review |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- startups
- securities regulation
- fraud
- white collar crime
- securities enforcement
- SEC
- Theranos
- whistleblowers
- securities and exchange commission
- unicorns
- private companies