Priming and alignment: Mechanism or consequence?

Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Michael K. Tanenhaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We agree with Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) proposal that dialogue is an important empirical and theoretical test bed for models of language processing. However, we offer two cautionary notes. First, the enterprise will require explicit computational models. Second, such models will need to incorporate both joint and separate speaker and hearer commitments in ways that go beyond priming and alignment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-194
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Priming and alignment: Mechanism or consequence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this