TY - JOUR
T1 - PREDICTING EFFICACY TO TEACH WRITING
T2 - The Role of Attitudes, Perceptions of Students’ Progress, and Epistemological Beliefs
AU - Graham, Steve
AU - Hsiang, Tien Ping
AU - Ray, Amber B.
AU - Zheng, Guihua
AU - Hebert, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The University of Chicago.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Three studies examined if teachers’ beliefs about writing predicted their efficacy to teach writing. We surveyed primary grade teachers from Taiwan (N p 782), Shanghai (N p 429), and the United States (N p 214). At each location, teachers completed surveys assessing attitudes toward writing and the teaching of writing, beliefs about students’ progress as writers, and epistemological beliefs about writing instruction, writing development, and writing knowledge. We examined if each of these beliefs made unique and statistically significant contributions to pre-dicting efficacy to teach writing after variance due to all other predictors, as well as personal and contextual vari-ables, was controlled. With one exception, these three sets of beliefs each accounted for unique variance in pre-dicting teacher efficacy at each location. There was, how-ever, variability in unique variance in teacher efficacy scores accounted for by specific beliefs across locations and the factor structure of various measures by location.
AB - Three studies examined if teachers’ beliefs about writing predicted their efficacy to teach writing. We surveyed primary grade teachers from Taiwan (N p 782), Shanghai (N p 429), and the United States (N p 214). At each location, teachers completed surveys assessing attitudes toward writing and the teaching of writing, beliefs about students’ progress as writers, and epistemological beliefs about writing instruction, writing development, and writing knowledge. We examined if each of these beliefs made unique and statistically significant contributions to pre-dicting efficacy to teach writing after variance due to all other predictors, as well as personal and contextual vari-ables, was controlled. With one exception, these three sets of beliefs each accounted for unique variance in pre-dicting teacher efficacy at each location. There was, how-ever, variability in unique variance in teacher efficacy scores accounted for by specific beliefs across locations and the factor structure of various measures by location.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133020136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133020136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/720640
DO - 10.1086/720640
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85133020136
SN - 0013-5984
VL - 123
SP - 1
EP - 36
JO - Elementary School Journal
JF - Elementary School Journal
IS - 1
ER -