Practice makes (nearly) perfect: Solving 'students-and-professors'-type algebra word problems

Kiel Christianson, Jose P. Mestre, Steven G. Luke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Three experiments with university students (Ns=40, 36, and 36) who were non-math majors explicitly examined whether repetition in performing 'students-and-professors'-type algebra word problems, which have been shown in the past to be vexingly difficult even for more advanced students, would spontaneously lead to higher rates of correct answers. Word order and situation model specificity were also examined to determine their effects on the rate of improvement. The strongest predictor of students producing correct equations (i.e., not producing the typical 'reversal error') was practice: In all experiments, participants spontaneously improved in equation accuracy almost to ceiling levels as they progressed, despite receiving no feedback. Tentative support is provided for the pedagogical value of repetition in solving problems, along with varying the wording of the problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)810-822
Number of pages13
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Practice makes (nearly) perfect: Solving 'students-and-professors'-type algebra word problems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this