Power and status across cultures

Carlos Javier Torelli, Lisa M. Leslie, Christopher To, Sahoon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This article synthesizes recent psychological research at the intersection of power, status, and culture. Our review shows that culture affects how status and power are conceptualized, who attains them, and what their consequences are. In individualistic cultures (and particularly vertical ones that emphasize hierarchical arrangements), power is conceptualized in personalized terms (i.e. focus on self-benefits), competence drives status attainment, norm violations increase power, and individuals strive primarily for power, approve of powerholders that behave equitably, and feel happy when they have personal power. In contrast, in collectivistic cultures (and particularly horizontal ones that promote egalitarianism), power is conceptualized in socialized terms (i.e. focus on benefitting others), warmth and competence drive status attainment, norm adherence increases power, and individuals strive primarily for status, approve of powerholders that behave compassionately, and feel happy when they have socialized power. We discuss what remains unknown as a mechanism for guiding future work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-17
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume33
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Power (Psychology)
Psychology
Research
Drive

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Power and status across cultures. / Torelli, Carlos Javier; Leslie, Lisa M.; To, Christopher; Kim, Sahoon.

In: Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 33, 01.06.2020, p. 12-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Torelli, Carlos Javier ; Leslie, Lisa M. ; To, Christopher ; Kim, Sahoon. / Power and status across cultures. In: Current Opinion in Psychology. 2020 ; Vol. 33. pp. 12-17.
@article{b55cf20a54154a489e5d10d460b03235,
title = "Power and status across cultures",
abstract = "This article synthesizes recent psychological research at the intersection of power, status, and culture. Our review shows that culture affects how status and power are conceptualized, who attains them, and what their consequences are. In individualistic cultures (and particularly vertical ones that emphasize hierarchical arrangements), power is conceptualized in personalized terms (i.e. focus on self-benefits), competence drives status attainment, norm violations increase power, and individuals strive primarily for power, approve of powerholders that behave equitably, and feel happy when they have personal power. In contrast, in collectivistic cultures (and particularly horizontal ones that promote egalitarianism), power is conceptualized in socialized terms (i.e. focus on benefitting others), warmth and competence drive status attainment, norm adherence increases power, and individuals strive primarily for status, approve of powerholders that behave compassionately, and feel happy when they have socialized power. We discuss what remains unknown as a mechanism for guiding future work.",
author = "Torelli, {Carlos Javier} and Leslie, {Lisa M.} and Christopher To and Sahoon Kim",
year = "2020",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "12--17",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychology",
issn = "2352-250X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power and status across cultures

AU - Torelli, Carlos Javier

AU - Leslie, Lisa M.

AU - To, Christopher

AU - Kim, Sahoon

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - This article synthesizes recent psychological research at the intersection of power, status, and culture. Our review shows that culture affects how status and power are conceptualized, who attains them, and what their consequences are. In individualistic cultures (and particularly vertical ones that emphasize hierarchical arrangements), power is conceptualized in personalized terms (i.e. focus on self-benefits), competence drives status attainment, norm violations increase power, and individuals strive primarily for power, approve of powerholders that behave equitably, and feel happy when they have personal power. In contrast, in collectivistic cultures (and particularly horizontal ones that promote egalitarianism), power is conceptualized in socialized terms (i.e. focus on benefitting others), warmth and competence drive status attainment, norm adherence increases power, and individuals strive primarily for status, approve of powerholders that behave compassionately, and feel happy when they have socialized power. We discuss what remains unknown as a mechanism for guiding future work.

AB - This article synthesizes recent psychological research at the intersection of power, status, and culture. Our review shows that culture affects how status and power are conceptualized, who attains them, and what their consequences are. In individualistic cultures (and particularly vertical ones that emphasize hierarchical arrangements), power is conceptualized in personalized terms (i.e. focus on self-benefits), competence drives status attainment, norm violations increase power, and individuals strive primarily for power, approve of powerholders that behave equitably, and feel happy when they have personal power. In contrast, in collectivistic cultures (and particularly horizontal ones that promote egalitarianism), power is conceptualized in socialized terms (i.e. focus on benefitting others), warmth and competence drive status attainment, norm adherence increases power, and individuals strive primarily for status, approve of powerholders that behave compassionately, and feel happy when they have socialized power. We discuss what remains unknown as a mechanism for guiding future work.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069159024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069159024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.05.005

M3 - Review article

VL - 33

SP - 12

EP - 17

JO - Current Opinion in Psychology

JF - Current Opinion in Psychology

SN - 2352-250X

ER -