TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands
AU - Beerling, David J.
AU - Kantzas, Euripides P.
AU - Lomas, Mark R.
AU - Wade, Peter
AU - Eufrasio, Rafael M.
AU - Renforth, Phil
AU - Sarkar, Binoy
AU - Andrews, M. Grace
AU - James, Rachael H.
AU - Pearce, Christopher R.
AU - Mercure, Jean Francois
AU - Pollitt, Hector
AU - Holden, Philip B.
AU - Edwards, Neil R.
AU - Khanna, Madhu
AU - Koh, Lenny
AU - Quegan, Shaun
AU - Pidgeon, Nick F.
AU - Janssens, Ivan A.
AU - Hansen, James
AU - Banwart, Steven A.
N1 - Acknowledgements We thank A. Azapagic and J. Shepherd for comments on an earlier draft, and acknowledge discussions with additional members of the Royal Society-Royal Academy of Engineering Greenhouse Gas Removal Working Group. We acknowledge funding of this research with a Leverhulme Research Centre Award (RC-2015-029) from the Leverhulme Trust. We thank L. Taylor for advice and discussions during model development and J. Quirk for data and analysis on plant weathering. P.R. acknowledges UKRI funding under the UK Greenhouse Gas Removal Programme (NE/P019943/1, NE/P019730/1); I.A.J. acknowledges financial support from the Research Council of the University of Antwerp. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling responsible for CMIP and thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP, the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led the development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
PY - 2020/7/9
Y1 - 2020/7/9
N2 - Enhanced silicate rock weathering (ERW), deployable with croplands, has potential use for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) removal (CDR), which is now necessary to mitigate anthropogenic climate change1. ERW also has possible co-benefits for improved food and soil security, and reduced ocean acidification2–4. Here we use an integrated performance modelling approach to make an initial techno-economic assessment for 2050, quantifying how CDR potential and costs vary among nations in relation to business-as-usual energy policies and policies consistent with limiting future warming to 2 degrees Celsius5. China, India, the USA and Brazil have great potential to help achieve average global CDR goals of 0.5 to 2 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year with extraction costs of approximately US$80–180 per tonne of CO2. These goals and costs are robust, regardless of future energy policies. Deployment within existing croplands offers opportunities to align agriculture and climate policy. However, success will depend upon overcoming political and social inertia to develop regulatory and incentive frameworks. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of ERW deployment, including the potential for excess industrial silicate materials (basalt mine overburden, concrete, and iron and steel slag) to obviate the need for new mining, as well as uncertainties in soil weathering rates and land–ocean transfer of weathered products.
AB - Enhanced silicate rock weathering (ERW), deployable with croplands, has potential use for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) removal (CDR), which is now necessary to mitigate anthropogenic climate change1. ERW also has possible co-benefits for improved food and soil security, and reduced ocean acidification2–4. Here we use an integrated performance modelling approach to make an initial techno-economic assessment for 2050, quantifying how CDR potential and costs vary among nations in relation to business-as-usual energy policies and policies consistent with limiting future warming to 2 degrees Celsius5. China, India, the USA and Brazil have great potential to help achieve average global CDR goals of 0.5 to 2 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per year with extraction costs of approximately US$80–180 per tonne of CO2. These goals and costs are robust, regardless of future energy policies. Deployment within existing croplands offers opportunities to align agriculture and climate policy. However, success will depend upon overcoming political and social inertia to develop regulatory and incentive frameworks. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of ERW deployment, including the potential for excess industrial silicate materials (basalt mine overburden, concrete, and iron and steel slag) to obviate the need for new mining, as well as uncertainties in soil weathering rates and land–ocean transfer of weathered products.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087720319
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087720319#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-020-2448-9
DO - 10.1038/s41586-020-2448-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 32641817
AN - SCOPUS:85087720319
SN - 0028-0836
VL - 583
SP - 242
EP - 248
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
IS - 7815
ER -