Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects: On Paracelsus and Plant Products

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The eating habits of herbivorous insects have long been of more than passing interest to humans, particularly since the domestication of plants some 8000 years ago, but the precise relationship between herbivorous insects and their host plants has persistently defied characterization. That plant chemicals, rather than nutritive substances, determine at least in part the peculiar likes and dislikes of insects, as they do for humans, is an idea of rather recent origin. The suggestion that the diversity of plant chemistry might be defensive in function was introduced when M. Leo Errera, in an address to the Royal Botanical Society of Belgium in 1886, remarked that, “many of the chemical compounds may serve the plant as means of defense against animals, and when we camphorize our furniture and poison our flower-beds, we are only imitating and reinventing what the plants practiced before the existence of man” (Abbott, 1887). The importance of insects as selective agents in determining patterns of plant chemistry in the “parallel evolution” (Brues, 1920) of insects and plants was not articulated until Fraenkel (1959) suggested that “reciprocal adaptive evolution” determined patterns of host-plant use by insects. Ehrlich and Raven (1964) coined the term “coevolution” to describe the stepwise process by which plants elaborate chemical defenses and insects evolve mechanisms of resistance or tolerance to those defenses.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInsect-Plant Interactions
EditorsJames R Miller, Thomas A Miller
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Chapter5
Pages121-153
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4612-4910-8
ISBN (Print)978-1-4612-9356-9
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986

Publication series

NameSpringer Series in Experimental Entomology
ISSN (Print)0172-6188

Fingerprint

plant products
phytopharmaceuticals
insects
plant biochemistry
phytophagous insects
host plants
parallel evolution
furniture
chemical compounds
coevolution
domestication
resistance mechanisms
eating habits
Belgium
flowers
animals

Keywords

  • artificial diet
  • plant constituent
  • tobacco hornworm
  • contact toxicity
  • cellulose acetate phthalate

Cite this

Berenbaum, M. (1986). Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects: On Paracelsus and Plant Products. In J. R. Miller, & T. A. Miller (Eds.), Insect-Plant Interactions (pp. 121-153). (Springer Series in Experimental Entomology). New York: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_5

Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects : On Paracelsus and Plant Products. / Berenbaum, May.

Insect-Plant Interactions. ed. / James R Miller; Thomas A Miller. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1986. p. 121-153 (Springer Series in Experimental Entomology).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Berenbaum, M 1986, Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects: On Paracelsus and Plant Products. in JR Miller & TA Miller (eds), Insect-Plant Interactions. Springer Series in Experimental Entomology, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 121-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_5
Berenbaum M. Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects: On Paracelsus and Plant Products. In Miller JR, Miller TA, editors, Insect-Plant Interactions. New York: Springer-Verlag. 1986. p. 121-153. (Springer Series in Experimental Entomology). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_5
Berenbaum, May. / Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects : On Paracelsus and Plant Products. Insect-Plant Interactions. editor / James R Miller ; Thomas A Miller. New York : Springer-Verlag, 1986. pp. 121-153 (Springer Series in Experimental Entomology).
@inbook{11dbcd5b51184ab3b31536fb095ebebe,
title = "Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects: On Paracelsus and Plant Products",
abstract = "The eating habits of herbivorous insects have long been of more than passing interest to humans, particularly since the domestication of plants some 8000 years ago, but the precise relationship between herbivorous insects and their host plants has persistently defied characterization. That plant chemicals, rather than nutritive substances, determine at least in part the peculiar likes and dislikes of insects, as they do for humans, is an idea of rather recent origin. The suggestion that the diversity of plant chemistry might be defensive in function was introduced when M. Leo Errera, in an address to the Royal Botanical Society of Belgium in 1886, remarked that, “many of the chemical compounds may serve the plant as means of defense against animals, and when we camphorize our furniture and poison our flower-beds, we are only imitating and reinventing what the plants practiced before the existence of man” (Abbott, 1887). The importance of insects as selective agents in determining patterns of plant chemistry in the “parallel evolution” (Brues, 1920) of insects and plants was not articulated until Fraenkel (1959) suggested that “reciprocal adaptive evolution” determined patterns of host-plant use by insects. Ehrlich and Raven (1964) coined the term “coevolution” to describe the stepwise process by which plants elaborate chemical defenses and insects evolve mechanisms of resistance or tolerance to those defenses.",
keywords = "artificial diet, plant constituent, tobacco hornworm, contact toxicity, cellulose acetate phthalate",
author = "May Berenbaum",
year = "1986",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_5",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "978-1-4612-9356-9",
series = "Springer Series in Experimental Entomology",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
pages = "121--153",
editor = "Miller, {James R} and Miller, {Thomas A}",
booktitle = "Insect-Plant Interactions",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Postingestive Effects of Phytochemicals On Insects

T2 - On Paracelsus and Plant Products

AU - Berenbaum, May

PY - 1986

Y1 - 1986

N2 - The eating habits of herbivorous insects have long been of more than passing interest to humans, particularly since the domestication of plants some 8000 years ago, but the precise relationship between herbivorous insects and their host plants has persistently defied characterization. That plant chemicals, rather than nutritive substances, determine at least in part the peculiar likes and dislikes of insects, as they do for humans, is an idea of rather recent origin. The suggestion that the diversity of plant chemistry might be defensive in function was introduced when M. Leo Errera, in an address to the Royal Botanical Society of Belgium in 1886, remarked that, “many of the chemical compounds may serve the plant as means of defense against animals, and when we camphorize our furniture and poison our flower-beds, we are only imitating and reinventing what the plants practiced before the existence of man” (Abbott, 1887). The importance of insects as selective agents in determining patterns of plant chemistry in the “parallel evolution” (Brues, 1920) of insects and plants was not articulated until Fraenkel (1959) suggested that “reciprocal adaptive evolution” determined patterns of host-plant use by insects. Ehrlich and Raven (1964) coined the term “coevolution” to describe the stepwise process by which plants elaborate chemical defenses and insects evolve mechanisms of resistance or tolerance to those defenses.

AB - The eating habits of herbivorous insects have long been of more than passing interest to humans, particularly since the domestication of plants some 8000 years ago, but the precise relationship between herbivorous insects and their host plants has persistently defied characterization. That plant chemicals, rather than nutritive substances, determine at least in part the peculiar likes and dislikes of insects, as they do for humans, is an idea of rather recent origin. The suggestion that the diversity of plant chemistry might be defensive in function was introduced when M. Leo Errera, in an address to the Royal Botanical Society of Belgium in 1886, remarked that, “many of the chemical compounds may serve the plant as means of defense against animals, and when we camphorize our furniture and poison our flower-beds, we are only imitating and reinventing what the plants practiced before the existence of man” (Abbott, 1887). The importance of insects as selective agents in determining patterns of plant chemistry in the “parallel evolution” (Brues, 1920) of insects and plants was not articulated until Fraenkel (1959) suggested that “reciprocal adaptive evolution” determined patterns of host-plant use by insects. Ehrlich and Raven (1964) coined the term “coevolution” to describe the stepwise process by which plants elaborate chemical defenses and insects evolve mechanisms of resistance or tolerance to those defenses.

KW - artificial diet

KW - plant constituent

KW - tobacco hornworm

KW - contact toxicity

KW - cellulose acetate phthalate

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_5

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4612-4910-8_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-4612-9356-9

T3 - Springer Series in Experimental Entomology

SP - 121

EP - 153

BT - Insect-Plant Interactions

A2 - Miller, James R

A2 - Miller, Thomas A

PB - Springer-Verlag

CY - New York

ER -