TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-cooling semen processing and sperm re-suspension as an alternative method to circumvent poor semen cooling in stallions
AU - Segabinazzi, Lorenzo
AU - Carmo, Marcio T.
AU - Freitas-Dell'Aqua, Camila de P.
AU - Alvarenga, Marco A.
AU - Papa, Frederico O.
AU - Canisso, Igor F.
N1 - This work was supported by S\u00E3o Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP grant #2017/13883\u20109).
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: Artificial insemination with cooled-shipped semen is the primary method used in the equine breeding industry; yet, sperm quality and fertility can be suboptimal for some stallions when standard techniques are used. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop alternative approaches for these stallions. Objective: To assess sperm quality parameters and fertility of cooled-stored stallion semen processed by SpermFilter® or centrifugation and resuspended in three extenders. Study design: Controlled and field study. Methods: In Experiment 1, semen was collected from 21 stallions classified as having good (‘Good-coolers’, n = 8) or poor (‘Bad-coolers’, n = 13) semen cooling. The semen was extended at 30 million spermatozoa/mL in a skimmed milk-based (SM) diluent, and refrigerated for 24 h. Then, the cooled-stored semen was processed through SpermFilter® or centrifugation, and the resulting sperm pellets were resuspended in SM, SM containing pentoxifylline (SM-P), or an egg yolk-based (EY) extender. Unprocessed cooled-stored semen served as control. Sperm motility parameters, plasma membrane integrity (PMI), and mitochondrial membrane potential (HMMP) were assessed in cooled-semen pre- and post-processing. Experiment 2, cooled semen from 9 stallions classified as Bad-coolers was used to inseminate 18 embryo donor mares at 66 cycles (Unprocessed, n = 22; SpermFilter®/SM-P, n = 16; or SpermFilter®/EY, n = 28). Data were analysed with a mixed model and Tukey's as posthoc, and logistic regression. Results: Processed semen resuspended in EY had superior sperm motility compared to unprocessed, SM and SM-P (p < 0.0001). Semen processed by SpermFilter® resuspended in SM-P was similar to EY (p > 0.05). Pellet resuspension with EY and SM-P improved the HMMP of Bad-cooler stallions (p = 0.0010). Semen processed by SpermFilter® had superior PMI to centrifuged semen (p < 0.0001). Mares inseminated with SpermFilter®/SM-P (50%, 8/16) or SpermFilter®/-EY (68%, 9/28) had higher pregnancy rates than mares bred with unprocessed semen (14%, 3/22) (p < 0.001). Main limitations: Low number of mares in the fertility trial. Conclusion: Sperm quality and fertility of Bad-cooler stallions can be enhanced by SpermFilter® and pellet resuspension with either EY or SM-P.
AB - Background: Artificial insemination with cooled-shipped semen is the primary method used in the equine breeding industry; yet, sperm quality and fertility can be suboptimal for some stallions when standard techniques are used. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop alternative approaches for these stallions. Objective: To assess sperm quality parameters and fertility of cooled-stored stallion semen processed by SpermFilter® or centrifugation and resuspended in three extenders. Study design: Controlled and field study. Methods: In Experiment 1, semen was collected from 21 stallions classified as having good (‘Good-coolers’, n = 8) or poor (‘Bad-coolers’, n = 13) semen cooling. The semen was extended at 30 million spermatozoa/mL in a skimmed milk-based (SM) diluent, and refrigerated for 24 h. Then, the cooled-stored semen was processed through SpermFilter® or centrifugation, and the resulting sperm pellets were resuspended in SM, SM containing pentoxifylline (SM-P), or an egg yolk-based (EY) extender. Unprocessed cooled-stored semen served as control. Sperm motility parameters, plasma membrane integrity (PMI), and mitochondrial membrane potential (HMMP) were assessed in cooled-semen pre- and post-processing. Experiment 2, cooled semen from 9 stallions classified as Bad-coolers was used to inseminate 18 embryo donor mares at 66 cycles (Unprocessed, n = 22; SpermFilter®/SM-P, n = 16; or SpermFilter®/EY, n = 28). Data were analysed with a mixed model and Tukey's as posthoc, and logistic regression. Results: Processed semen resuspended in EY had superior sperm motility compared to unprocessed, SM and SM-P (p < 0.0001). Semen processed by SpermFilter® resuspended in SM-P was similar to EY (p > 0.05). Pellet resuspension with EY and SM-P improved the HMMP of Bad-cooler stallions (p = 0.0010). Semen processed by SpermFilter® had superior PMI to centrifuged semen (p < 0.0001). Mares inseminated with SpermFilter®/SM-P (50%, 8/16) or SpermFilter®/-EY (68%, 9/28) had higher pregnancy rates than mares bred with unprocessed semen (14%, 3/22) (p < 0.001). Main limitations: Low number of mares in the fertility trial. Conclusion: Sperm quality and fertility of Bad-cooler stallions can be enhanced by SpermFilter® and pellet resuspension with either EY or SM-P.
KW - bad cooler stallions
KW - fertility
KW - horse
KW - semen extender
KW - sperm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195040468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85195040468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/evj.14085
DO - 10.1111/evj.14085
M3 - Article
C2 - 38567428
AN - SCOPUS:85195040468
SN - 0425-1644
VL - 56
SP - 697
EP - 710
JO - Equine veterinary journal
JF - Equine veterinary journal
IS - 4
ER -