TY - JOUR
T1 - Political resources and direct state intervention
T2 - The adoption of public venture capital programs in the American States, 1974-1990
AU - Leicht, Kevin T.
AU - Jenkins, J. Craig
N1 - Funding Information:
*Both of us share equally in this paper. We thank Michael Wallace and Don Grant for providing some of their data on state economic policies and contexts. We also thank Kurt Schock, Brian Martin, Brian Harley and Frank Beck for research assistance, the Obermann Center for Advanced Study at The University of Iowa, the Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, and the Office of Research, The Ohio State University, for financial assistance. Correspondence should be directed to Kevin T. Leicht, Department of Sociology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1401. E-mail: [email protected].
PY - 1998/6
Y1 - 1998/6
N2 - Discussions of policy formation have reached an impasse with accumulating support for rival theories. We address this impasse by advancing a "political resource" theory that synthesizes class-, state-centered, neocorporatist and institutional ideas to explain policy formation in advanced capitalist democracies. Political institutions constitute infrastructural resources that condition the instrumental resources of class actors and channel the effects of class mobilization. Capitalists have systemic power by virtue of the state's dependence on private capital accumulation. We use this theory to explain the direct economic intervention of state governments in the U.S. in creating public venture capital programs in the 1970s and 1980s. An event history analysis shows that the adoption of these programs was shaped by a mesocorporatist "pact" combining capital/labor peak association bargaining with administrative capacities, structural dependence on corporate profits and manufacturing industry, professionalized state legislatures pressured by deindustrialization and the loss of instrumental resources due to declining Federal transfers to state governments. In an era of globalization and economic restructuring, the subnational state has become a centerpoint for industrial policy innovations in pluralistic states like the U.S.
AB - Discussions of policy formation have reached an impasse with accumulating support for rival theories. We address this impasse by advancing a "political resource" theory that synthesizes class-, state-centered, neocorporatist and institutional ideas to explain policy formation in advanced capitalist democracies. Political institutions constitute infrastructural resources that condition the instrumental resources of class actors and channel the effects of class mobilization. Capitalists have systemic power by virtue of the state's dependence on private capital accumulation. We use this theory to explain the direct economic intervention of state governments in the U.S. in creating public venture capital programs in the 1970s and 1980s. An event history analysis shows that the adoption of these programs was shaped by a mesocorporatist "pact" combining capital/labor peak association bargaining with administrative capacities, structural dependence on corporate profits and manufacturing industry, professionalized state legislatures pressured by deindustrialization and the loss of instrumental resources due to declining Federal transfers to state governments. In an era of globalization and economic restructuring, the subnational state has become a centerpoint for industrial policy innovations in pluralistic states like the U.S.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032367144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032367144&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/sf/76.4.1323
DO - 10.1093/sf/76.4.1323
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032367144
SN - 0037-7732
VL - 76
SP - 1323
EP - 1345
JO - Social Forces
JF - Social Forces
IS - 4
ER -