Planning the urban forest: Adding microclimate simulation to the planner's toolkit

Aaron C. Petri, Beverly K Wilson, Andrew Koeser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While cities across the United States are developing urban forest plans to capitalize on a myriad of ecosystem services provided by trees, the tools that are used to support this planning do not necessarily meet the needs and achieve the desired results of these municipal initiatives. This paper highlights the disconnect between how planners and academics are approaching the task of planning and managing the urban forest for climate change adaptation. Although planners tend to focus on maximizing canopy coverage, academics utilize microclimate simulation to evaluate the impact of different interventions on heat island mitigation. We argue that while the i-Tree suite is the most commonly used tool and is immensely helpful for urban forest planners, cities and communities concerned with heat island mitigation should also leverage microclimate simulation tools to better understand the likely impacts of a plan. This study provides a general critique of the i-Tree tool for planning and illustrates how, when used with a microclimate simulation tool, the siting of street trees can have a greater impact on heat island mitigation. The focus here is on the community-scale impact of trees and a microclimate simulation model of a neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois where tree canopy coverage is less than 10% and consistently declining is presented. We find that when microclimate is considered during the tree siting process, trees have a greater impact on surface and air temperatures during the summer. Reduced ground surface temperatures of around 3 ℃ to 7.5 ℃ were achieved around 13:00 (1:00 pm), whereas the impact of trees from shading had the greatest impact (0.75 ℃ to 7.75 ℃) on nearby buildings in the mid-afternoon (15:00 to 17:00 h).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104117
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume88
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2019

Fingerprint

urban planning
microclimate
simulation
planning
heat
heat island
mitigation
surface temperature
coverage
canopy
street trees
simulation model
community
ecosystem services
building
shading
climate change
ecosystem service
air
simulation models

Keywords

  • Chicago
  • Climate adaptation
  • Microclimate simulation
  • Urban greening
  • Urban heat islands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Planning the urban forest : Adding microclimate simulation to the planner's toolkit. / Petri, Aaron C.; Wilson, Beverly K; Koeser, Andrew.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 88, 104117, 11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4f244a4d61654ff6ba39613253fa728b,
title = "Planning the urban forest: Adding microclimate simulation to the planner's toolkit",
abstract = "While cities across the United States are developing urban forest plans to capitalize on a myriad of ecosystem services provided by trees, the tools that are used to support this planning do not necessarily meet the needs and achieve the desired results of these municipal initiatives. This paper highlights the disconnect between how planners and academics are approaching the task of planning and managing the urban forest for climate change adaptation. Although planners tend to focus on maximizing canopy coverage, academics utilize microclimate simulation to evaluate the impact of different interventions on heat island mitigation. We argue that while the i-Tree suite is the most commonly used tool and is immensely helpful for urban forest planners, cities and communities concerned with heat island mitigation should also leverage microclimate simulation tools to better understand the likely impacts of a plan. This study provides a general critique of the i-Tree tool for planning and illustrates how, when used with a microclimate simulation tool, the siting of street trees can have a greater impact on heat island mitigation. The focus here is on the community-scale impact of trees and a microclimate simulation model of a neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois where tree canopy coverage is less than 10{\%} and consistently declining is presented. We find that when microclimate is considered during the tree siting process, trees have a greater impact on surface and air temperatures during the summer. Reduced ground surface temperatures of around 3 ℃ to 7.5 ℃ were achieved around 13:00 (1:00 pm), whereas the impact of trees from shading had the greatest impact (0.75 ℃ to 7.75 ℃) on nearby buildings in the mid-afternoon (15:00 to 17:00 h).",
keywords = "Chicago, Climate adaptation, Microclimate simulation, Urban greening, Urban heat islands",
author = "Petri, {Aaron C.} and Wilson, {Beverly K} and Andrew Koeser",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planning the urban forest

T2 - Adding microclimate simulation to the planner's toolkit

AU - Petri, Aaron C.

AU - Wilson, Beverly K

AU - Koeser, Andrew

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - While cities across the United States are developing urban forest plans to capitalize on a myriad of ecosystem services provided by trees, the tools that are used to support this planning do not necessarily meet the needs and achieve the desired results of these municipal initiatives. This paper highlights the disconnect between how planners and academics are approaching the task of planning and managing the urban forest for climate change adaptation. Although planners tend to focus on maximizing canopy coverage, academics utilize microclimate simulation to evaluate the impact of different interventions on heat island mitigation. We argue that while the i-Tree suite is the most commonly used tool and is immensely helpful for urban forest planners, cities and communities concerned with heat island mitigation should also leverage microclimate simulation tools to better understand the likely impacts of a plan. This study provides a general critique of the i-Tree tool for planning and illustrates how, when used with a microclimate simulation tool, the siting of street trees can have a greater impact on heat island mitigation. The focus here is on the community-scale impact of trees and a microclimate simulation model of a neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois where tree canopy coverage is less than 10% and consistently declining is presented. We find that when microclimate is considered during the tree siting process, trees have a greater impact on surface and air temperatures during the summer. Reduced ground surface temperatures of around 3 ℃ to 7.5 ℃ were achieved around 13:00 (1:00 pm), whereas the impact of trees from shading had the greatest impact (0.75 ℃ to 7.75 ℃) on nearby buildings in the mid-afternoon (15:00 to 17:00 h).

AB - While cities across the United States are developing urban forest plans to capitalize on a myriad of ecosystem services provided by trees, the tools that are used to support this planning do not necessarily meet the needs and achieve the desired results of these municipal initiatives. This paper highlights the disconnect between how planners and academics are approaching the task of planning and managing the urban forest for climate change adaptation. Although planners tend to focus on maximizing canopy coverage, academics utilize microclimate simulation to evaluate the impact of different interventions on heat island mitigation. We argue that while the i-Tree suite is the most commonly used tool and is immensely helpful for urban forest planners, cities and communities concerned with heat island mitigation should also leverage microclimate simulation tools to better understand the likely impacts of a plan. This study provides a general critique of the i-Tree tool for planning and illustrates how, when used with a microclimate simulation tool, the siting of street trees can have a greater impact on heat island mitigation. The focus here is on the community-scale impact of trees and a microclimate simulation model of a neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois where tree canopy coverage is less than 10% and consistently declining is presented. We find that when microclimate is considered during the tree siting process, trees have a greater impact on surface and air temperatures during the summer. Reduced ground surface temperatures of around 3 ℃ to 7.5 ℃ were achieved around 13:00 (1:00 pm), whereas the impact of trees from shading had the greatest impact (0.75 ℃ to 7.75 ℃) on nearby buildings in the mid-afternoon (15:00 to 17:00 h).

KW - Chicago

KW - Climate adaptation

KW - Microclimate simulation

KW - Urban greening

KW - Urban heat islands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070314433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070314433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104117

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104117

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070314433

VL - 88

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

M1 - 104117

ER -