TY - JOUR
T1 - Places as referents in discourse
AU - Morrow, Daniel G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported by Postdoctoral Grant I F32 NS07390-01 and Training Grant MH 15157-09 from the National Institute of Mental Health. I thank Richard P. Meier and Herbert H. Clark for their comments on the paper. Reprint requests should be addressed to Dr. Daniel G. Morrow. Department of Psychology, Jordan Hall. Stanford University, Sanford, CA 94305.
PY - 1986/12
Y1 - 1986/12
N2 - The present study investigated how the prominence of places in discourse is influenced by their role in the described situations and their order of mention in the text. Experiment 1 compared descriptions, where places have a central role as theme, with narratives, where thematic places are less central because they serve as setting for characters and events. Readers chose places as referent for an ambiguous pronoun. For descriptions, they tended to choose thematic places, but for narratives they tended to choose recently mentioned places. This suggests that when places are central to discourse, their prominence is determined by their role in the described situations; otherwise it is determined by order of mention. Experiment 2 provides further evidence that places are noncentral to narratives because cause of their setting function. Thus, readers try to choose as referents entities that are central to the described situations. They resort to order of mention only when situational cues are absent or conflicting.
AB - The present study investigated how the prominence of places in discourse is influenced by their role in the described situations and their order of mention in the text. Experiment 1 compared descriptions, where places have a central role as theme, with narratives, where thematic places are less central because they serve as setting for characters and events. Readers chose places as referent for an ambiguous pronoun. For descriptions, they tended to choose thematic places, but for narratives they tended to choose recently mentioned places. This suggests that when places are central to discourse, their prominence is determined by their role in the described situations; otherwise it is determined by order of mention. Experiment 2 provides further evidence that places are noncentral to narratives because cause of their setting function. Thus, readers try to choose as referents entities that are central to the described situations. They resort to order of mention only when situational cues are absent or conflicting.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248887337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248887337&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90043-4
DO - 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90043-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34248887337
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 25
SP - 676
EP - 690
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 6
ER -