Picture the difference: Electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres

Kara D. Federmeier, Marta Kutas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The nature of semantic memory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in meaning processing were examined using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by pictures in sentences. Participants read sentence pairs ending with the lateralized presentation of three target types: (1) expected pictures, (2) unexpected pictures from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected pictures from an unexpected category. ERPs to contextually unexpected pictures were more negative 350-500ms (larger N400s) than those to expected pictures in both visual fields. However, while N400s to the two types of unexpected items did not differ with left visual field presentations, they were smaller to the unexpected items from the expected category with right visual field presentations. This pattern, previously observed to words [Brain Language 62 (1998) 149], suggests general differences in how the two hemispheres use context on-line. Other aspects of the N400 response - and effects on earlier ERP components - reveal differences between pictures and words, suggesting that semantic memory access is not modality-independent. The P2 component varied with ending type for right but not left visual field presentations, suggesting that the left hemisphere may use contextual information to prepare for the visual analysis of upcoming stimuli. Furthermore, there was clear evidence for an earlier negativity ("N300"), which varied with ending type but, unlike the N400, was unaffected by visual field of presentation. Overall, the results support our hypothesis that the left hemisphere actively uses top-down information to preactivate perceptual and semantic features of upcoming stimuli, while the right hemisphere adopts a "wait and see" integrative approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)730-747
Number of pages18
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebrum
Visual Fields
Semantics
Evoked Potentials
Brain
Language

Keywords

  • Hemispheric differences
  • N300
  • N400
  • Semantic memory
  • Sentence processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Picture the difference : Electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. / Federmeier, Kara D.; Kutas, Marta.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 40, No. 7, 01.01.2002, p. 730-747.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5e76f8357d64b95aeb5da34a07ab729,
title = "Picture the difference: Electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres",
abstract = "The nature of semantic memory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in meaning processing were examined using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by pictures in sentences. Participants read sentence pairs ending with the lateralized presentation of three target types: (1) expected pictures, (2) unexpected pictures from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected pictures from an unexpected category. ERPs to contextually unexpected pictures were more negative 350-500ms (larger N400s) than those to expected pictures in both visual fields. However, while N400s to the two types of unexpected items did not differ with left visual field presentations, they were smaller to the unexpected items from the expected category with right visual field presentations. This pattern, previously observed to words [Brain Language 62 (1998) 149], suggests general differences in how the two hemispheres use context on-line. Other aspects of the N400 response - and effects on earlier ERP components - reveal differences between pictures and words, suggesting that semantic memory access is not modality-independent. The P2 component varied with ending type for right but not left visual field presentations, suggesting that the left hemisphere may use contextual information to prepare for the visual analysis of upcoming stimuli. Furthermore, there was clear evidence for an earlier negativity ({"}N300{"}), which varied with ending type but, unlike the N400, was unaffected by visual field of presentation. Overall, the results support our hypothesis that the left hemisphere actively uses top-down information to preactivate perceptual and semantic features of upcoming stimuli, while the right hemisphere adopts a {"}wait and see{"} integrative approach.",
keywords = "Hemispheric differences, N300, N400, Semantic memory, Sentence processing",
author = "Federmeier, {Kara D.} and Marta Kutas",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00193-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "730--747",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Picture the difference

T2 - Electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres

AU - Federmeier, Kara D.

AU - Kutas, Marta

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The nature of semantic memory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in meaning processing were examined using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by pictures in sentences. Participants read sentence pairs ending with the lateralized presentation of three target types: (1) expected pictures, (2) unexpected pictures from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected pictures from an unexpected category. ERPs to contextually unexpected pictures were more negative 350-500ms (larger N400s) than those to expected pictures in both visual fields. However, while N400s to the two types of unexpected items did not differ with left visual field presentations, they were smaller to the unexpected items from the expected category with right visual field presentations. This pattern, previously observed to words [Brain Language 62 (1998) 149], suggests general differences in how the two hemispheres use context on-line. Other aspects of the N400 response - and effects on earlier ERP components - reveal differences between pictures and words, suggesting that semantic memory access is not modality-independent. The P2 component varied with ending type for right but not left visual field presentations, suggesting that the left hemisphere may use contextual information to prepare for the visual analysis of upcoming stimuli. Furthermore, there was clear evidence for an earlier negativity ("N300"), which varied with ending type but, unlike the N400, was unaffected by visual field of presentation. Overall, the results support our hypothesis that the left hemisphere actively uses top-down information to preactivate perceptual and semantic features of upcoming stimuli, while the right hemisphere adopts a "wait and see" integrative approach.

AB - The nature of semantic memory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in meaning processing were examined using event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited by pictures in sentences. Participants read sentence pairs ending with the lateralized presentation of three target types: (1) expected pictures, (2) unexpected pictures from the expected semantic category, and (3) unexpected pictures from an unexpected category. ERPs to contextually unexpected pictures were more negative 350-500ms (larger N400s) than those to expected pictures in both visual fields. However, while N400s to the two types of unexpected items did not differ with left visual field presentations, they were smaller to the unexpected items from the expected category with right visual field presentations. This pattern, previously observed to words [Brain Language 62 (1998) 149], suggests general differences in how the two hemispheres use context on-line. Other aspects of the N400 response - and effects on earlier ERP components - reveal differences between pictures and words, suggesting that semantic memory access is not modality-independent. The P2 component varied with ending type for right but not left visual field presentations, suggesting that the left hemisphere may use contextual information to prepare for the visual analysis of upcoming stimuli. Furthermore, there was clear evidence for an earlier negativity ("N300"), which varied with ending type but, unlike the N400, was unaffected by visual field of presentation. Overall, the results support our hypothesis that the left hemisphere actively uses top-down information to preactivate perceptual and semantic features of upcoming stimuli, while the right hemisphere adopts a "wait and see" integrative approach.

KW - Hemispheric differences

KW - N300

KW - N400

KW - Semantic memory

KW - Sentence processing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036119994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036119994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00193-2

DO - 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00193-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 11900725

AN - SCOPUS:0036119994

VL - 40

SP - 730

EP - 747

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 7

ER -