Abstract

Introduction to Plant Biotic Stress: Agricultural and native plants are subject to a myriad of biotic stresses inflicted by other living organisms, from viruses to mammals, and many of these damaging agents affect photosynthesis, either by altering its underlying metabolism (primary photochemistry, electron transport, Calvin cycle) or gas diffusion, or by reducing photosynthetic leaf area. Pathogens (fungal, bacteria or viral agents) and animal pests causes on average, a 15% and 18% reduction in crop yield, respectively (Oerke and Dehne, 2004). Biotic stresses on plants have had enormous repercussions for humanity. For example, the potato blight (Phytophthora infestans) caused widespread famine in England, Ireland and Belgium, or the introduction of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae or Phylloxera vastatrix) from America in the mid 19th century nearly put an end to the French wine industry. In addition, it is predicted that plant-pathogen interactions will favour pathogens under the high CO2 conditions expected for the next decades (Lake and Wade, 2009). This chapter reviews the effects of parasitic plants, pathogens (virus, bacteria and fungi) and arthropods on photosynthesis. While competition among plants clearly is a ‘biotic interaction’, we have not included it in this discussion as competition often manifests itself through reduced availability of growth-limiting resources and does not affect photosynthesis per se. The underlying mechanisms by which biotic agents affect photosynthesis vary widely and it may be useful to classify these agents into different ‘damage guilds’ (Table 22.1), although it has been claimed that biotic stresses generally downregulate photosynthesis genes (Bilgin et al., 2010). Chewing insects, for example, reduce carbon gain primarily by reducing leaf area, where virus infections rarely reduce leaf area but instead depress the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area. Among fungi, leaf-disease fungi (rust, mildew, etc.) behave like herbivores in their ability to reduce photosynthetic leaf area, where vascular-wilt fungi compromise plant water transport and reduce photosynthesis by inducing stomatal closure. In addition to exploring how different biotic agents affect photosynthesis, this chapter concludes with a brief discussion of different methods for detecting the effects of biotic stress on photosynthesis, sometimes in advance of the development of visual symptoms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTerrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages331-350
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781139051477
ISBN (Print)9780521899413
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

Photosynthesis
biotic stress
photosynthesis
Daktulosphaira vitifoliae
leaf area
fungi
Fungi
plant pathogens
viruses
vertebrate pests
vascular wilt
Phytophthora infestans
famine
plant competition
wine industry
Bacteria
Photochemistry
parasitic plants
Plant Viruses
Calvin cycle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Barón, M., Flexas, J., & Delucia, E. H. (2011). Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress. In Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach (pp. 331-350). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051477.026

Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress. / Barón, M.; Flexas, J.; Delucia, Evan H.

Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 331-350.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Barón, M, Flexas, J & Delucia, EH 2011, Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress. in Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach. Cambridge University Press, pp. 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051477.026
Barón M, Flexas J, Delucia EH. Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress. In Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 331-350 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051477.026
Barón, M. ; Flexas, J. ; Delucia, Evan H. / Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress. Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 331-350
@inbook{27a73eff07ce4ade923b7d6f2b30a424,
title = "Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress",
abstract = "Introduction to Plant Biotic Stress: Agricultural and native plants are subject to a myriad of biotic stresses inflicted by other living organisms, from viruses to mammals, and many of these damaging agents affect photosynthesis, either by altering its underlying metabolism (primary photochemistry, electron transport, Calvin cycle) or gas diffusion, or by reducing photosynthetic leaf area. Pathogens (fungal, bacteria or viral agents) and animal pests causes on average, a 15{\%} and 18{\%} reduction in crop yield, respectively (Oerke and Dehne, 2004). Biotic stresses on plants have had enormous repercussions for humanity. For example, the potato blight (Phytophthora infestans) caused widespread famine in England, Ireland and Belgium, or the introduction of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae or Phylloxera vastatrix) from America in the mid 19th century nearly put an end to the French wine industry. In addition, it is predicted that plant-pathogen interactions will favour pathogens under the high CO2 conditions expected for the next decades (Lake and Wade, 2009). This chapter reviews the effects of parasitic plants, pathogens (virus, bacteria and fungi) and arthropods on photosynthesis. While competition among plants clearly is a ‘biotic interaction’, we have not included it in this discussion as competition often manifests itself through reduced availability of growth-limiting resources and does not affect photosynthesis per se. The underlying mechanisms by which biotic agents affect photosynthesis vary widely and it may be useful to classify these agents into different ‘damage guilds’ (Table 22.1), although it has been claimed that biotic stresses generally downregulate photosynthesis genes (Bilgin et al., 2010). Chewing insects, for example, reduce carbon gain primarily by reducing leaf area, where virus infections rarely reduce leaf area but instead depress the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area. Among fungi, leaf-disease fungi (rust, mildew, etc.) behave like herbivores in their ability to reduce photosynthetic leaf area, where vascular-wilt fungi compromise plant water transport and reduce photosynthesis by inducing stomatal closure. In addition to exploring how different biotic agents affect photosynthesis, this chapter concludes with a brief discussion of different methods for detecting the effects of biotic stress on photosynthesis, sometimes in advance of the development of visual symptoms.",
author = "M. Bar{\'o}n and J. Flexas and Delucia, {Evan H}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139051477.026",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521899413",
pages = "331--350",
booktitle = "Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress

AU - Barón, M.

AU - Flexas, J.

AU - Delucia, Evan H

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Introduction to Plant Biotic Stress: Agricultural and native plants are subject to a myriad of biotic stresses inflicted by other living organisms, from viruses to mammals, and many of these damaging agents affect photosynthesis, either by altering its underlying metabolism (primary photochemistry, electron transport, Calvin cycle) or gas diffusion, or by reducing photosynthetic leaf area. Pathogens (fungal, bacteria or viral agents) and animal pests causes on average, a 15% and 18% reduction in crop yield, respectively (Oerke and Dehne, 2004). Biotic stresses on plants have had enormous repercussions for humanity. For example, the potato blight (Phytophthora infestans) caused widespread famine in England, Ireland and Belgium, or the introduction of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae or Phylloxera vastatrix) from America in the mid 19th century nearly put an end to the French wine industry. In addition, it is predicted that plant-pathogen interactions will favour pathogens under the high CO2 conditions expected for the next decades (Lake and Wade, 2009). This chapter reviews the effects of parasitic plants, pathogens (virus, bacteria and fungi) and arthropods on photosynthesis. While competition among plants clearly is a ‘biotic interaction’, we have not included it in this discussion as competition often manifests itself through reduced availability of growth-limiting resources and does not affect photosynthesis per se. The underlying mechanisms by which biotic agents affect photosynthesis vary widely and it may be useful to classify these agents into different ‘damage guilds’ (Table 22.1), although it has been claimed that biotic stresses generally downregulate photosynthesis genes (Bilgin et al., 2010). Chewing insects, for example, reduce carbon gain primarily by reducing leaf area, where virus infections rarely reduce leaf area but instead depress the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area. Among fungi, leaf-disease fungi (rust, mildew, etc.) behave like herbivores in their ability to reduce photosynthetic leaf area, where vascular-wilt fungi compromise plant water transport and reduce photosynthesis by inducing stomatal closure. In addition to exploring how different biotic agents affect photosynthesis, this chapter concludes with a brief discussion of different methods for detecting the effects of biotic stress on photosynthesis, sometimes in advance of the development of visual symptoms.

AB - Introduction to Plant Biotic Stress: Agricultural and native plants are subject to a myriad of biotic stresses inflicted by other living organisms, from viruses to mammals, and many of these damaging agents affect photosynthesis, either by altering its underlying metabolism (primary photochemistry, electron transport, Calvin cycle) or gas diffusion, or by reducing photosynthetic leaf area. Pathogens (fungal, bacteria or viral agents) and animal pests causes on average, a 15% and 18% reduction in crop yield, respectively (Oerke and Dehne, 2004). Biotic stresses on plants have had enormous repercussions for humanity. For example, the potato blight (Phytophthora infestans) caused widespread famine in England, Ireland and Belgium, or the introduction of grape phylloxera (Daktulosphaira vitifoliae or Phylloxera vastatrix) from America in the mid 19th century nearly put an end to the French wine industry. In addition, it is predicted that plant-pathogen interactions will favour pathogens under the high CO2 conditions expected for the next decades (Lake and Wade, 2009). This chapter reviews the effects of parasitic plants, pathogens (virus, bacteria and fungi) and arthropods on photosynthesis. While competition among plants clearly is a ‘biotic interaction’, we have not included it in this discussion as competition often manifests itself through reduced availability of growth-limiting resources and does not affect photosynthesis per se. The underlying mechanisms by which biotic agents affect photosynthesis vary widely and it may be useful to classify these agents into different ‘damage guilds’ (Table 22.1), although it has been claimed that biotic stresses generally downregulate photosynthesis genes (Bilgin et al., 2010). Chewing insects, for example, reduce carbon gain primarily by reducing leaf area, where virus infections rarely reduce leaf area but instead depress the rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area. Among fungi, leaf-disease fungi (rust, mildew, etc.) behave like herbivores in their ability to reduce photosynthetic leaf area, where vascular-wilt fungi compromise plant water transport and reduce photosynthesis by inducing stomatal closure. In addition to exploring how different biotic agents affect photosynthesis, this chapter concludes with a brief discussion of different methods for detecting the effects of biotic stress on photosynthesis, sometimes in advance of the development of visual symptoms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885600644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885600644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139051477.026

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139051477.026

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84885600644

SN - 9780521899413

SP - 331

EP - 350

BT - Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment a Molecular, Physiological and Ecological Approach

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -