Philosophy as the Study of Defective Concepts

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

From familiar concepts like tall and table to exotic ones like gravity and genocide, they guide our lives and are the basis for how we represent the world. However, there is good reason to think that many of our most cherished concepts, like truth, freedom, knowledge, and rationality, are defective in the sense that the rules for using them are inconsistent. This defect leads those who possess these concepts into paradoxes and absurdities. Indeed, I argue that many of the central problems of contemporary philosophy should be thought of as having their source in philosophical concepts that are defective in this way. If that is right, then we should take a more active role in crafting and sculpting our conceptual repertoire. We need to explore various ways of replacing these defective concepts with ones that will still do the work we need them to do without leading us into contradictions.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics
EditorsAlexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen, David Plunkett
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages396-416
ISBN (Electronic)9780191840418
ISBN (Print)9780198801856
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 23 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • conceptual engineering
  • conceptual ethics
  • amelioration
  • constitutive principles
  • methodological naturalism
  • concepts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Philosophy as the Study of Defective Concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this