TY - JOUR
T1 - PhenoCam Guidelines for Phenological Measurement and Analysis in an Agricultural Cropping Environment
T2 - A Case Study of Soybean
AU - Sunoj, S.
AU - Igathinathane, C.
AU - Saliendra, Nicanor
AU - Hendrickson, John
AU - Archer, David
AU - Liebig, Mark
N1 - This work was supported in part by the Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory (NGPRL), USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Mandan, ND, grant numbers: FAR0028541 and FAR0036174, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Projects: ND01481 and ND01493. The development of PhenoCam has been supported by the Northeastern States Research Cooperative, NSF\u2019s Macrosystems Biology program (award EF-1065029), DOE\u2019s Regional and Global Climate Modeling program (award DE-SC0016011), and the US National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program and the USA National Phenology Network (grant number G10AP00129 from the United States Geological Survey). NGPRL research is funded by ARS project number 3064-21600-001-000D.
The assistance provided by Justin Feld and Jessica Duttenhefner during the field crop visual assessment of soybean growth stages was highly appreciated. PhenoCam collaborators, including site PIs and technicians, are thanked for their efforts in support of PhenoCam. Site availability was facilitated by the Area 4 Soil Conservation Districts in North Dakota. This research was a contribution from the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) network. LTAR is supported by the United States Department of Agriculture.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - A PhenoCam is a near-surface remote sensing system traditionally used for monitoring phenological changes in diverse landscapes. Although initially developed for forest landscapes, these near-surface remote sensing systems are increasingly being adopted in agricultural settings, with deployment expanding from 106 sites in 2020 to 839 sites by February 2025. However, agricultural applications present unique challenges because of rapid crop development and the need for precise phenological monitoring. Despite the increasing number of PhenoCam sites, clear guidelines are missing on (i) the phenological analysis of images, (ii) the selection of a suitable color vegetation index (CVI), and (iii) the extraction of growth stages. This knowledge gap limits the full potential of PhenoCams in agricultural applications. Therefore, a study was conducted in two soybean (Glycine max L.) fields to formulate image analysis guidelines for PhenoCam images. Weekly visual assessments of soybean phenological stages were compared with PhenoCam images. A total of 15 CVIs were tested for their ability to reproduce the seasonal variation from RGB, HSB, and Lab color spaces. The effects of image acquisition time groups (10:00 (Formula presented.) –14:00 (Formula presented.)) and object position (ROI locations: far, middle, and near) on selected CVIs were statistically analyzed. Excess green minus excess red (EXGR), color index of vegetation (CIVE), green leaf index (GLI), and normalized green red difference index (NGRDI) were selected based on the least deviation from their loess-smoothed phenological curve at each image acquisition time. For the selected four CVIs, the time groups did not have a significant effect on CVI values, while the object position had significant effects at the reproductive phase. Among the selected CVIs, GLI and EXGR exhibited the least deviation within the image acquisition time and object position groups. Overall, we recommend employing a consistent image acquisition time to ensure sufficient light, capture the largest possible image ROI in the middle region of the field, and apply any of the selected CVIs in order of GLI, EXGR, NGRDI, and CIVE. These results provide a standardized methodology and serve as guidelines for PhenoCam image analysis in agricultural cropping environments. These guidelines can be incorporated into the standard protocol of the PhenoCam network.
AB - A PhenoCam is a near-surface remote sensing system traditionally used for monitoring phenological changes in diverse landscapes. Although initially developed for forest landscapes, these near-surface remote sensing systems are increasingly being adopted in agricultural settings, with deployment expanding from 106 sites in 2020 to 839 sites by February 2025. However, agricultural applications present unique challenges because of rapid crop development and the need for precise phenological monitoring. Despite the increasing number of PhenoCam sites, clear guidelines are missing on (i) the phenological analysis of images, (ii) the selection of a suitable color vegetation index (CVI), and (iii) the extraction of growth stages. This knowledge gap limits the full potential of PhenoCams in agricultural applications. Therefore, a study was conducted in two soybean (Glycine max L.) fields to formulate image analysis guidelines for PhenoCam images. Weekly visual assessments of soybean phenological stages were compared with PhenoCam images. A total of 15 CVIs were tested for their ability to reproduce the seasonal variation from RGB, HSB, and Lab color spaces. The effects of image acquisition time groups (10:00 (Formula presented.) –14:00 (Formula presented.)) and object position (ROI locations: far, middle, and near) on selected CVIs were statistically analyzed. Excess green minus excess red (EXGR), color index of vegetation (CIVE), green leaf index (GLI), and normalized green red difference index (NGRDI) were selected based on the least deviation from their loess-smoothed phenological curve at each image acquisition time. For the selected four CVIs, the time groups did not have a significant effect on CVI values, while the object position had significant effects at the reproductive phase. Among the selected CVIs, GLI and EXGR exhibited the least deviation within the image acquisition time and object position groups. Overall, we recommend employing a consistent image acquisition time to ensure sufficient light, capture the largest possible image ROI in the middle region of the field, and apply any of the selected CVIs in order of GLI, EXGR, NGRDI, and CIVE. These results provide a standardized methodology and serve as guidelines for PhenoCam image analysis in agricultural cropping environments. These guidelines can be incorporated into the standard protocol of the PhenoCam network.
KW - image processing
KW - PhenoCam
KW - phenology
KW - remote sensing
KW - soybean
KW - vegetation index
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85219196668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85219196668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/rs17040724
DO - 10.3390/rs17040724
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-4292
VL - 17
JO - Remote Sensing
JF - Remote Sensing
IS - 4
M1 - 724
ER -