TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II trial of lapatinib and topotecan (LapTop) in patients with platinum-refractory/resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma
AU - Weroha, S. John
AU - Oberg, Ann L.
AU - Ziegler, Katie L.Allen
AU - Dakhilm, Shaker R.
AU - Rowland, Kendrith M.
AU - Hartmann, Lynn C.
AU - Moore, Dennis F.
AU - Keeney, Gary L.
AU - Peethambaram, Prema P.
AU - Haluska, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by GlaxoSmithKline and the following, United States National Institutes of Health Grant ( CA136393 ), Mayo Clinic SPORE in Ovarian Cancer , (CA136393), NIH K12 ( CA090628-05 ), and the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center ( CA15083 ).
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - Objective: Resistance to chemotherapy is a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian/peritoneal cancer. One purported mechanism of topotecan resistance is the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and adverse event profile of concomitant topotecan and lapatinib, a small molecule pan-erbB inhibitor that can block BCRP/Pgp efflux of topotecan. Methods: Patients with platinum-refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer were treated with topotecan 3.2 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8 and 15 and lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily, continuously in 28 day cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. For correlative studies, archived tissue was assessed for expression of EGFR, HER2, HIF-1α, CD31, and BCRP. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled and treated. Four experienced evidence of clinical benefit: one partial response and three with stable disease. Using a two-stage Simon design, the trial was stopped after the first stage due to insufficient activity. Grades 3+ and 4+ adverse events (AE) were experienced in 14 and 4 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 AE were neutropenia (56%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and diarrhea (22%). Conclusions: The combination of lapatinib plus topotecan for the treatment of platinum refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer lacks sufficient activity to warrant further investigation. In particular, hematologic adverse events were substantial. Expression of correlative study markers did not reveal patterns of predicted benefit or toxicity. Disruption of erbB signaling and BCRP/Pgp efflux with lapatinib was insufficient for overcoming topotecan resistance, suggesting alternative mechanisms of resistance are involved.
AB - Objective: Resistance to chemotherapy is a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian/peritoneal cancer. One purported mechanism of topotecan resistance is the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein (Pgp). We designed a phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and adverse event profile of concomitant topotecan and lapatinib, a small molecule pan-erbB inhibitor that can block BCRP/Pgp efflux of topotecan. Methods: Patients with platinum-refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer were treated with topotecan 3.2 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8 and 15 and lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily, continuously in 28 day cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate. For correlative studies, archived tissue was assessed for expression of EGFR, HER2, HIF-1α, CD31, and BCRP. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled and treated. Four experienced evidence of clinical benefit: one partial response and three with stable disease. Using a two-stage Simon design, the trial was stopped after the first stage due to insufficient activity. Grades 3+ and 4+ adverse events (AE) were experienced in 14 and 4 patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 AE were neutropenia (56%), thrombocytopenia (28%), and diarrhea (22%). Conclusions: The combination of lapatinib plus topotecan for the treatment of platinum refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer lacks sufficient activity to warrant further investigation. In particular, hematologic adverse events were substantial. Expression of correlative study markers did not reveal patterns of predicted benefit or toxicity. Disruption of erbB signaling and BCRP/Pgp efflux with lapatinib was insufficient for overcoming topotecan resistance, suggesting alternative mechanisms of resistance are involved.
KW - Lapatinib
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Refractory
KW - Resistant
KW - Topotecan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957697421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957697421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.030
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 21514634
AN - SCOPUS:79957697421
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 122
SP - 116
EP - 120
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 1
ER -