Personality traits change in adulthood: reply to Costa and McCrae (2006).

Brent W. Roberts, Kate E. Walton, Wolfgang Viechtbauer

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In a response to comments by P. T. Costa, Jr., and R. R. McCrae on the current authors' original article, the authors show that Costa and McCrae's writings on personality suggest a belief in immutability of personality traits. The authors agree with Costa and McCrae that new personality trait models that provide an accurate lower order structure of personality traits are needed and explain why the Revised NEO Personality Inventory is not the correct model for that purpose. The authors provide direct evidence refuting the hypothesis that personality traits change only because of biologically based intrinsic maturation. The authors present arguments supporting the contention that meta-analyses should be preferred to single longitudinal studies when drawing inferences about general patterns of personality development. Finally, the authors point out why the differences between their position and Costa and McCrae's are important.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-32
Number of pages4
JournalPsychological bulletin
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Personality traits change in adulthood: reply to Costa and McCrae (2006).'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this