TY - JOUR
T1 - Perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task in 6.5-month-old infants
AU - Aguiar, Andréa
AU - Baillargeon, Renée
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by grants to the first author from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the University of Waterloo, and CAPES-Brasilia/Brasil (BEX-2688), and by a grant to the second author from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-21104). We thank Dov Cohen, Cindy Fisher, Greg Murphy, Kris Onishi, and Brian Ross for helpful comments and suggestions, Yuyan Luo and Karen Menard for their help with the data analyses, and Deepa Block, Laura Brueckner, Beth Cullum, Laura Glaser, Sue Hespos, Gavin Huntley-Fenner, Lisa Kaufman, Laura Kotovsky, Melsie Minna, Helen Raschke, and Teresa Wilcox for their help with the data collection. We also thank the parents who kindly agreed to have their infants participate in the research.
PY - 2003/7/1
Y1 - 2003/7/1
N2 - In the present research, 6.5-month-old infants perseverated in a violation-of-expectation task designed to examine their reasoning about width information in containment events. After watching a familiarization event in which a ball was lowered into a wide container, the infants failed to detect the violation in a test event in which the same ball was lowered into a container only half as wide as the ball (narrow-container test event). This negative result (which was replicated in another experiment) was interpreted in terms of a recent problem-solving account of infants' perseverative errors in various means-end tasks (Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (2000). Perseveration and problem solving in infancy. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 27, pp. 135-180). San Diego, CA: Academic Press). It was assumed that the infants in the present experiments (1) did not attend to the relative widths of the ball and container in their initial analysis of the narrow-container test event, (2) categorized the event as similar to the familiarization event shown on the preceding trials, and (3) retrieved the expectation they had formed for that event ("the ball will fit into the container"), resulting in a perseverative error. This interpretation was supported by additional experiments in which different modifications were introduced that led to non-perseverative responding, indicating that 6.5-month-old infants could detect the violation in the narrow-container test event. The present findings are important for several reasons. First, they provide the first demonstration of perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task. Second, they make clear the breadth and usefulness of the problem-solving account mentioned above. Finally, they add to the evidence for some degree of continuity between infants' and adults' problem-solving abilities.
AB - In the present research, 6.5-month-old infants perseverated in a violation-of-expectation task designed to examine their reasoning about width information in containment events. After watching a familiarization event in which a ball was lowered into a wide container, the infants failed to detect the violation in a test event in which the same ball was lowered into a container only half as wide as the ball (narrow-container test event). This negative result (which was replicated in another experiment) was interpreted in terms of a recent problem-solving account of infants' perseverative errors in various means-end tasks (Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (2000). Perseveration and problem solving in infancy. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 27, pp. 135-180). San Diego, CA: Academic Press). It was assumed that the infants in the present experiments (1) did not attend to the relative widths of the ball and container in their initial analysis of the narrow-container test event, (2) categorized the event as similar to the familiarization event shown on the preceding trials, and (3) retrieved the expectation they had formed for that event ("the ball will fit into the container"), resulting in a perseverative error. This interpretation was supported by additional experiments in which different modifications were introduced that led to non-perseverative responding, indicating that 6.5-month-old infants could detect the violation in the narrow-container test event. The present findings are important for several reasons. First, they provide the first demonstration of perseverative responding in a violation-of-expectation task. Second, they make clear the breadth and usefulness of the problem-solving account mentioned above. Finally, they add to the evidence for some degree of continuity between infants' and adults' problem-solving abilities.
KW - Infant cognition
KW - Perseveration
KW - Physical reasoning
KW - Violation-of-expectation task
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037527551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037527551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00044-1
DO - 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00044-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 12804814
AN - SCOPUS:0037527551
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 88
SP - 277
EP - 316
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
IS - 3
ER -