TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility
T2 - Segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors
AU - Fogerty, Daniel
AU - Humes, Larry E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Diane Kewley-Port for her comments regarding this study and Robert Felty for his assistance in marking segmental boundaries and transcription computer code. This work was supported, in part, by NIA R01 AG008293.
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - This study investigated the relative contributions of consonants and vowels to the perceptual intelligibility of monosyllabic consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words. A noise replacement paradigm presented CVCs with only consonants or only vowels preserved. Results demonstrated no difference between overall word accuracy in these conditions; however, different error patterns were observed. A significant effect of lexical difficulty was demonstrated for both types of replacement, whereas the noise level used during replacement did not influence results. The contribution of consonant and vowel transitional information present at the consonant-vowel boundary was also explored. The proportion of speech presented, regardless of the segmental condition, overwhelmingly predicted performance. Comparisons were made with previous segment replacement results using sentences [Fogerty, and Kewley-Port (2009). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 847-857]. Results demonstrated that consonants contribute to intelligibility equally in both isolated CVC words and sentences. However, vowel contributions were mediated by context, with greater contributions to intelligibility in sentence contexts. Therefore, it appears that vowels in sentences carry unique speech cues that greatly facilitate intelligibility which are not informative and/or present during isolated word contexts. Consonants appear to provide speech cues that are equally available and informative during sentence and isolated word presentations.
AB - This study investigated the relative contributions of consonants and vowels to the perceptual intelligibility of monosyllabic consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words. A noise replacement paradigm presented CVCs with only consonants or only vowels preserved. Results demonstrated no difference between overall word accuracy in these conditions; however, different error patterns were observed. A significant effect of lexical difficulty was demonstrated for both types of replacement, whereas the noise level used during replacement did not influence results. The contribution of consonant and vowel transitional information present at the consonant-vowel boundary was also explored. The proportion of speech presented, regardless of the segmental condition, overwhelmingly predicted performance. Comparisons were made with previous segment replacement results using sentences [Fogerty, and Kewley-Port (2009). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 847-857]. Results demonstrated that consonants contribute to intelligibility equally in both isolated CVC words and sentences. However, vowel contributions were mediated by context, with greater contributions to intelligibility in sentence contexts. Therefore, it appears that vowels in sentences carry unique speech cues that greatly facilitate intelligibility which are not informative and/or present during isolated word contexts. Consonants appear to provide speech cues that are equally available and informative during sentence and isolated word presentations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649628196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649628196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.3493439
DO - 10.1121/1.3493439
M3 - Article
C2 - 21110607
AN - SCOPUS:78649628196
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 128
SP - 3114
EP - 3125
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 5
ER -