Peer Review

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter critically evaluates the system-wide practice of the peer review process, particularly the system for scholarly journal publications, and the implications of this practice for knowledge production. Production of knowledge in the social sciences is about the creation of social knowledge. The peer review process provides the ex ante assessment of journal publications by relying on the expertise of peer reviewers who take on the responsibility for assuring high quality standards. This system is not without its critics, however. This chapter entertains several proposals that may serve as alternatives, ranging from minor modifications to complete abolition of the system. Potential advantages and disadvantages of each alternative are explored.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Production of Knowledge
Subtitle of host publicationEnhancing Progress in Social Science
EditorsColin Elman, John Gerring, James Mahoney
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter4
Pages73-97
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9781108762519
ISBN (Print)9781108486774, 9781108708289
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 31 2020

Keywords

  • Peer review
  • double-blind
  • gatekeepers
  • knowledge production
  • publishing
  • social knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peer Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this