TY - JOUR
T1 - Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation
AU - Hein, Lars
AU - Miller, Daniel C.
AU - de Groot, Rudolf
N1 - Funding Information:
LH gratefully acknowledges the European Research Council for supporting this research (research grant# 263027 (ECOSPACE)). DCM thanks research support from the Graham Environmental Sustainability Institute at the University of Michigan and the MacArthur Foundation through the Advancing Conservation in a Social Context research initiative. We thank three anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - It is generally recognized that addressing the ongoing loss of global biodiversity requires a substantial increase in funding for conservation activities, particularly in developing countries. An increasing interest in Payment Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services (PES) begs the question of whether a focus on developing payment mechanisms will also reduce the ongoing loss of global biodiversity. We review, firstly, current flows of funds for biodiversity conservation, including PES and other market mechanisms, and secondly, the opportunities and constraints of PES to contribute to biodiversity protection globally. We argue that PES can and should make an important contribution, but that it will not be sufficient to rely on PES alone to finance the actions necessary to substantially reduce biodiversity loss. In response to the identified constraints, we believe there is a need to develop additional funding mechanisms specifically targeted at biodiversity conservation.
AB - It is generally recognized that addressing the ongoing loss of global biodiversity requires a substantial increase in funding for conservation activities, particularly in developing countries. An increasing interest in Payment Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services (PES) begs the question of whether a focus on developing payment mechanisms will also reduce the ongoing loss of global biodiversity. We review, firstly, current flows of funds for biodiversity conservation, including PES and other market mechanisms, and secondly, the opportunities and constraints of PES to contribute to biodiversity protection globally. We argue that PES can and should make an important contribution, but that it will not be sufficient to rely on PES alone to finance the actions necessary to substantially reduce biodiversity loss. In response to the identified constraints, we believe there is a need to develop additional funding mechanisms specifically targeted at biodiversity conservation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875542738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875542738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.004
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.004
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84875542738
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 5
SP - 87
EP - 93
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
IS - 1
ER -