Patterns of humeral asymmetry among Late Pleistocene humans

Vitale S. Sparacello, Sébastien Villotte, Laura L. Shackelford, Erik Trinkaus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Human humeral diaphyseal asymmetry in midshaft and mid-distal rigidity is assessed through the Late Pleistocene in samples of late archaic (Neandertal) and early modern humans. It is considered with respect to directionality (handedness), levels of asymmetry, body size and sexual differences. The overall Late Pleistocene sample indicates a right-handed preference in frequencies (right: 74.8%, left: 15.0%, ambiguous: 10.3%), which are similar to those of recent human samples. Average levels of humeral asymmetry are elevated relative to Holocene samples through all but the small Middle Paleolithic modern human and eastern Eurasian late Upper Paleolithic samples. Humeral asymmetry is especially high among the males relative to the females, and the possibility of a division of labor between uni-manual tasks (mostly male) and bi-manual tasks (mostly female) is considered. At the same time, there is a general pattern of increased asymmetry with larger body size, but it remains unclear to what extent it reflects body size versus sexual effects on bilateral humeral loading. There do not appear to have been substantial changes in humeral asymmetry through time, indicating a continuity of similar manual behavioral patterns through the Late Pleistocene, despite considerable changes in technology through the Late Pleistocene.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)680-689
Number of pages10
JournalComptes Rendus - Palevol
Volume16
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

asymmetry
Pleistocene
body size
Paleolithic
handedness
labor division
rigidity
Holocene

Keywords

  • Cross-sectional geometry
  • Diaphysis
  • Humerus
  • Modern humans
  • Neandertals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Palaeontology

Cite this

Patterns of humeral asymmetry among Late Pleistocene humans. / Sparacello, Vitale S.; Villotte, Sébastien; Shackelford, Laura L.; Trinkaus, Erik.

In: Comptes Rendus - Palevol, Vol. 16, No. 5-6, 01.08.2017, p. 680-689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sparacello, Vitale S. ; Villotte, Sébastien ; Shackelford, Laura L. ; Trinkaus, Erik. / Patterns of humeral asymmetry among Late Pleistocene humans. In: Comptes Rendus - Palevol. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 5-6. pp. 680-689.
@article{fd6f32120b5049699af4b47d2bcaf5a4,
title = "Patterns of humeral asymmetry among Late Pleistocene humans",
abstract = "Human humeral diaphyseal asymmetry in midshaft and mid-distal rigidity is assessed through the Late Pleistocene in samples of late archaic (Neandertal) and early modern humans. It is considered with respect to directionality (handedness), levels of asymmetry, body size and sexual differences. The overall Late Pleistocene sample indicates a right-handed preference in frequencies (right: 74.8{\%}, left: 15.0{\%}, ambiguous: 10.3{\%}), which are similar to those of recent human samples. Average levels of humeral asymmetry are elevated relative to Holocene samples through all but the small Middle Paleolithic modern human and eastern Eurasian late Upper Paleolithic samples. Humeral asymmetry is especially high among the males relative to the females, and the possibility of a division of labor between uni-manual tasks (mostly male) and bi-manual tasks (mostly female) is considered. At the same time, there is a general pattern of increased asymmetry with larger body size, but it remains unclear to what extent it reflects body size versus sexual effects on bilateral humeral loading. There do not appear to have been substantial changes in humeral asymmetry through time, indicating a continuity of similar manual behavioral patterns through the Late Pleistocene, despite considerable changes in technology through the Late Pleistocene.",
keywords = "Cross-sectional geometry, Diaphysis, Humerus, Modern humans, Neandertals",
author = "Sparacello, {Vitale S.} and S{\'e}bastien Villotte and Shackelford, {Laura L.} and Erik Trinkaus",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.crpv.2016.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "680--689",
journal = "Comptes Rendus - Palevol",
issn = "1631-0683",
publisher = "Elsevier Masson",
number = "5-6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of humeral asymmetry among Late Pleistocene humans

AU - Sparacello, Vitale S.

AU - Villotte, Sébastien

AU - Shackelford, Laura L.

AU - Trinkaus, Erik

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Human humeral diaphyseal asymmetry in midshaft and mid-distal rigidity is assessed through the Late Pleistocene in samples of late archaic (Neandertal) and early modern humans. It is considered with respect to directionality (handedness), levels of asymmetry, body size and sexual differences. The overall Late Pleistocene sample indicates a right-handed preference in frequencies (right: 74.8%, left: 15.0%, ambiguous: 10.3%), which are similar to those of recent human samples. Average levels of humeral asymmetry are elevated relative to Holocene samples through all but the small Middle Paleolithic modern human and eastern Eurasian late Upper Paleolithic samples. Humeral asymmetry is especially high among the males relative to the females, and the possibility of a division of labor between uni-manual tasks (mostly male) and bi-manual tasks (mostly female) is considered. At the same time, there is a general pattern of increased asymmetry with larger body size, but it remains unclear to what extent it reflects body size versus sexual effects on bilateral humeral loading. There do not appear to have been substantial changes in humeral asymmetry through time, indicating a continuity of similar manual behavioral patterns through the Late Pleistocene, despite considerable changes in technology through the Late Pleistocene.

AB - Human humeral diaphyseal asymmetry in midshaft and mid-distal rigidity is assessed through the Late Pleistocene in samples of late archaic (Neandertal) and early modern humans. It is considered with respect to directionality (handedness), levels of asymmetry, body size and sexual differences. The overall Late Pleistocene sample indicates a right-handed preference in frequencies (right: 74.8%, left: 15.0%, ambiguous: 10.3%), which are similar to those of recent human samples. Average levels of humeral asymmetry are elevated relative to Holocene samples through all but the small Middle Paleolithic modern human and eastern Eurasian late Upper Paleolithic samples. Humeral asymmetry is especially high among the males relative to the females, and the possibility of a division of labor between uni-manual tasks (mostly male) and bi-manual tasks (mostly female) is considered. At the same time, there is a general pattern of increased asymmetry with larger body size, but it remains unclear to what extent it reflects body size versus sexual effects on bilateral humeral loading. There do not appear to have been substantial changes in humeral asymmetry through time, indicating a continuity of similar manual behavioral patterns through the Late Pleistocene, despite considerable changes in technology through the Late Pleistocene.

KW - Cross-sectional geometry

KW - Diaphysis

KW - Humerus

KW - Modern humans

KW - Neandertals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006699086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006699086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.crpv.2016.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.crpv.2016.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 680

EP - 689

JO - Comptes Rendus - Palevol

JF - Comptes Rendus - Palevol

SN - 1631-0683

IS - 5-6

ER -