TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient compliance behavior
T2 - The effects of time on patients' values of treatment regimens
AU - Christensen-Szalanski, Jay J.J.
AU - Northcraft, Gregory B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgemenrs-We thank Lee Roy Beach, Joel Brock-ner, Terry Connolly, Rick Williams and Gerrit Wolf for criticisms of earlier drafts of this paper. This work was partially supported by U.S.A. Office of Naval Research contract No. NOOOl4-82-K-0657 (Lee R. Beach and Jay Christensen-Szalanski, Principal Investigators) and U.S.A. National Science Foundation grant No. IST-8408717 (Gregory Northcraft and Margaret Neale, Principal Investigators).
PY - 1985
Y1 - 1985
N2 - Present medical models of treatment compliance have not addressed the role that time plays in the perception of a treatment regimen's costs and benefits. This paper re-evaluates the role of time in understanding compliance behavior. Models from the economic and psychological literature are used to demonstrate that the 'discounting effect' associated with future events, and the 'sunk cost effect' associated with past events may have a direct and predictable impact on the patient's values in health care choices. This article suggests that when the effects of time are incorporated into expectancy models of compliance behavior (such as the Health Belief Model) the resulting predictions are supported by numerous findings in the compliance literature, many of which were previously unaccountable by these expectancy models. From this finding an explanation is derived for the variable results of educational and attitudinal change programs upon compliance behavior, the success of patient contracts, the sudden occurence of preference reversals in health care choices, and the 'confusing' effect of treatment cost on treatment adherence. This paper also introduces to the compliance literature the concept of a treatment's time adjusted rate of return', and speculates upon how this concept may be used to understand the relationship between a treatment's 'desirability' or its ability to motivate a person to start the treatment, and its 'resistance' or its capacity to help a person to finish the treatment once it has begun. It proposes (1) that changes in the temporal distribution of a treatment's benefits and costs can improve the treatment's desirability and resistance, and (2) that a treatment's time adjusted rate of return can be used to allocate more efficiently the effort that provides spend monitoring patient compliance.
AB - Present medical models of treatment compliance have not addressed the role that time plays in the perception of a treatment regimen's costs and benefits. This paper re-evaluates the role of time in understanding compliance behavior. Models from the economic and psychological literature are used to demonstrate that the 'discounting effect' associated with future events, and the 'sunk cost effect' associated with past events may have a direct and predictable impact on the patient's values in health care choices. This article suggests that when the effects of time are incorporated into expectancy models of compliance behavior (such as the Health Belief Model) the resulting predictions are supported by numerous findings in the compliance literature, many of which were previously unaccountable by these expectancy models. From this finding an explanation is derived for the variable results of educational and attitudinal change programs upon compliance behavior, the success of patient contracts, the sudden occurence of preference reversals in health care choices, and the 'confusing' effect of treatment cost on treatment adherence. This paper also introduces to the compliance literature the concept of a treatment's time adjusted rate of return', and speculates upon how this concept may be used to understand the relationship between a treatment's 'desirability' or its ability to motivate a person to start the treatment, and its 'resistance' or its capacity to help a person to finish the treatment once it has begun. It proposes (1) that changes in the temporal distribution of a treatment's benefits and costs can improve the treatment's desirability and resistance, and (2) that a treatment's time adjusted rate of return can be used to allocate more efficiently the effort that provides spend monitoring patient compliance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022336745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022336745&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90100-5
DO - 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90100-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 3929392
AN - SCOPUS:0022336745
VL - 21
SP - 263
EP - 273
JO - Ethics in Science and Medicine
JF - Ethics in Science and Medicine
SN - 0277-9536
IS - 3
ER -