Pathways of Commitment to Wed: The Development and Dissolution of Romantic Relationships

Brian Gabriel Ogolsky, Catherine A. Surra, J. Kale Monk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors used changes in commitment to wed and reasons for these changes to classify couples into developmental pathways. Using data from a random sample of dating couples (N=376), they found 4 distinct commitment processes: (a) dramatic, (b) conflict ridden, (c) socially involved, and (d) partner focused. Dramatic commitments were defined by relatively frequent fluctuations in commitment and negative attributions about their relationships. Conflict-ridden commitments were defined by high levels of conflict and relatively frequent decreases in commitment. Individuals in socially involved commitments reported the highest proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to joint interaction with social networks. Those in partner-focused commitments reported a high proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to interaction with partners. Types also differed on important relational variables, including satisfaction, love, ambivalence, worries about marriage, and leisure. Dramatic commitments were more likely than any other type to break up and showed an increased likelihood of regression in stage of involvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-310
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Marriage and Family
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

commitment
attribution
Pathway
Dissolution
Romantic Relationships
interaction
ambivalence
random sample
fluctuation
love
social network
marriage
regression
Attribution

Keywords

  • Commitment
  • Dissolution
  • Love
  • Mate selection
  • Satisfaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Pathways of Commitment to Wed : The Development and Dissolution of Romantic Relationships. / Ogolsky, Brian Gabriel; Surra, Catherine A.; Monk, J. Kale.

In: Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 78, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 293-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f80d6e56e0246ff9509e70afacc672d,
title = "Pathways of Commitment to Wed: The Development and Dissolution of Romantic Relationships",
abstract = "The authors used changes in commitment to wed and reasons for these changes to classify couples into developmental pathways. Using data from a random sample of dating couples (N=376), they found 4 distinct commitment processes: (a) dramatic, (b) conflict ridden, (c) socially involved, and (d) partner focused. Dramatic commitments were defined by relatively frequent fluctuations in commitment and negative attributions about their relationships. Conflict-ridden commitments were defined by high levels of conflict and relatively frequent decreases in commitment. Individuals in socially involved commitments reported the highest proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to joint interaction with social networks. Those in partner-focused commitments reported a high proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to interaction with partners. Types also differed on important relational variables, including satisfaction, love, ambivalence, worries about marriage, and leisure. Dramatic commitments were more likely than any other type to break up and showed an increased likelihood of regression in stage of involvement.",
keywords = "Commitment, Dissolution, Love, Mate selection, Satisfaction",
author = "Ogolsky, {Brian Gabriel} and Surra, {Catherine A.} and Monk, {J. Kale}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jomf.12260",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "293--310",
journal = "Journal of Marriage and Family",
issn = "0022-2445",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathways of Commitment to Wed

T2 - The Development and Dissolution of Romantic Relationships

AU - Ogolsky, Brian Gabriel

AU - Surra, Catherine A.

AU - Monk, J. Kale

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - The authors used changes in commitment to wed and reasons for these changes to classify couples into developmental pathways. Using data from a random sample of dating couples (N=376), they found 4 distinct commitment processes: (a) dramatic, (b) conflict ridden, (c) socially involved, and (d) partner focused. Dramatic commitments were defined by relatively frequent fluctuations in commitment and negative attributions about their relationships. Conflict-ridden commitments were defined by high levels of conflict and relatively frequent decreases in commitment. Individuals in socially involved commitments reported the highest proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to joint interaction with social networks. Those in partner-focused commitments reported a high proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to interaction with partners. Types also differed on important relational variables, including satisfaction, love, ambivalence, worries about marriage, and leisure. Dramatic commitments were more likely than any other type to break up and showed an increased likelihood of regression in stage of involvement.

AB - The authors used changes in commitment to wed and reasons for these changes to classify couples into developmental pathways. Using data from a random sample of dating couples (N=376), they found 4 distinct commitment processes: (a) dramatic, (b) conflict ridden, (c) socially involved, and (d) partner focused. Dramatic commitments were defined by relatively frequent fluctuations in commitment and negative attributions about their relationships. Conflict-ridden commitments were defined by high levels of conflict and relatively frequent decreases in commitment. Individuals in socially involved commitments reported the highest proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to joint interaction with social networks. Those in partner-focused commitments reported a high proportion of positive dyadic attributions and references to interaction with partners. Types also differed on important relational variables, including satisfaction, love, ambivalence, worries about marriage, and leisure. Dramatic commitments were more likely than any other type to break up and showed an increased likelihood of regression in stage of involvement.

KW - Commitment

KW - Dissolution

KW - Love

KW - Mate selection

KW - Satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959577212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959577212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jomf.12260

DO - 10.1111/jomf.12260

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959577212

VL - 78

SP - 293

EP - 310

JO - Journal of Marriage and Family

JF - Journal of Marriage and Family

SN - 0022-2445

IS - 2

ER -