TY - GEN
T1 - Path vector face routing
T2 - 13TH IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP 2005
AU - Leong, Ben
AU - Mitra, Sayan
AU - Liskov, Barbara
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Existing geographic routing algorithms depend on the planarization of the network connectivity graph for correctness, and the planarization process gives rise to a well-defined notion of "faces". In this paper, we demonstrate that we can improve routing performance by storing a small amount of local face information at each node. We present a protocol, Path Vector Exchange (PVEX), that maintains local face information at each node efficiently, and a new geographic routing algorithm, Greedy Path Vector Face Routing (GPVFR), that achieves better routing performance in terms of both path stretch and hop stretch than existing geographic routing algorithms by exploiting available local face information. Our simulations demonstrate that GPVFR/PVEX achieves significantly reduced path and hop stretch than Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) and somewhat better performance than Greedy Other Adaptive Face Routing (GOAFR+) over a wide range of network topologies. The cost of this improved performance is a small amount of additional storage, and the bandwidth required for our algorithm is comparable to GPSR and GOAFR+ in quasi-static networks.
AB - Existing geographic routing algorithms depend on the planarization of the network connectivity graph for correctness, and the planarization process gives rise to a well-defined notion of "faces". In this paper, we demonstrate that we can improve routing performance by storing a small amount of local face information at each node. We present a protocol, Path Vector Exchange (PVEX), that maintains local face information at each node efficiently, and a new geographic routing algorithm, Greedy Path Vector Face Routing (GPVFR), that achieves better routing performance in terms of both path stretch and hop stretch than existing geographic routing algorithms by exploiting available local face information. Our simulations demonstrate that GPVFR/PVEX achieves significantly reduced path and hop stretch than Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) and somewhat better performance than Greedy Other Adaptive Face Routing (GOAFR+) over a wide range of network topologies. The cost of this improved performance is a small amount of additional storage, and the bandwidth required for our algorithm is comparable to GPSR and GOAFR+ in quasi-static networks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750949029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750949029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICNP.2005.32
DO - 10.1109/ICNP.2005.32
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33750949029
SN - 0769524370
SN - 9780769524375
T3 - Proceedings - International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP
SP - 147
EP - 158
BT - Proceedings - 13TH IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP 2005
Y2 - 6 November 2005 through 9 November 2005
ER -