Partisan Polarization and Legislators’ Agendas

Tracy Sulkin, Carly Schmitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Partisan polarization in legislators' roll call voting is well established. In this article, we examine whether partisan and ideological differentiation extends to legislators' agendas (i.e., the issue content of the bills and resolutions they introduce and cosponsor). Our analyses, focusing on the 101st-110th Congresses, reveal that differentiation occurs both across and within parties (e.g., Democrats and Republicans tend to pursue different issues in their legislative activity, as do moderate and more ideologically extreme copartisans), but that these differences are not typically large in magnitude and did not increase between the late 1980s and late 2000s. These findings suggest that the dynamics of polarization differ for roll call voting and agenda activities in ways that have important implications for our assessments of its consequences. In particular, they highlight that the polarization that has occurred is less a result of differing priorities between Democrats and Republicans and more a function of different preferences on those priority issues. This differentiation may bubble up in part from the true preferences of the rank-and-file, but it is also likely a function of the polarized choices that are presented to them on roll call votes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)430-448
Number of pages19
JournalPolity
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

polarization
voting
bill
voter

Keywords

  • Ideology
  • Introductions and cosponsorships
  • Legislative agendas
  • Polarization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Partisan Polarization and Legislators’ Agendas. / Sulkin, Tracy; Schmitt, Carly.

In: Polity, Vol. 46, No. 3, 07.2014, p. 430-448.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sulkin, Tracy ; Schmitt, Carly. / Partisan Polarization and Legislators’ Agendas. In: Polity. 2014 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 430-448.
@article{3ccdc9ee68654d88a9482b96944de39b,
title = "Partisan Polarization and Legislators’ Agendas",
abstract = "Partisan polarization in legislators' roll call voting is well established. In this article, we examine whether partisan and ideological differentiation extends to legislators' agendas (i.e., the issue content of the bills and resolutions they introduce and cosponsor). Our analyses, focusing on the 101st-110th Congresses, reveal that differentiation occurs both across and within parties (e.g., Democrats and Republicans tend to pursue different issues in their legislative activity, as do moderate and more ideologically extreme copartisans), but that these differences are not typically large in magnitude and did not increase between the late 1980s and late 2000s. These findings suggest that the dynamics of polarization differ for roll call voting and agenda activities in ways that have important implications for our assessments of its consequences. In particular, they highlight that the polarization that has occurred is less a result of differing priorities between Democrats and Republicans and more a function of different preferences on those priority issues. This differentiation may bubble up in part from the true preferences of the rank-and-file, but it is also likely a function of the polarized choices that are presented to them on roll call votes.",
keywords = "Ideology, Introductions and cosponsorships, Legislative agendas, Polarization",
author = "Tracy Sulkin and Carly Schmitt",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1057/pol.2014.9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "430--448",
journal = "Polity",
issn = "0032-3497",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partisan Polarization and Legislators’ Agendas

AU - Sulkin, Tracy

AU - Schmitt, Carly

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - Partisan polarization in legislators' roll call voting is well established. In this article, we examine whether partisan and ideological differentiation extends to legislators' agendas (i.e., the issue content of the bills and resolutions they introduce and cosponsor). Our analyses, focusing on the 101st-110th Congresses, reveal that differentiation occurs both across and within parties (e.g., Democrats and Republicans tend to pursue different issues in their legislative activity, as do moderate and more ideologically extreme copartisans), but that these differences are not typically large in magnitude and did not increase between the late 1980s and late 2000s. These findings suggest that the dynamics of polarization differ for roll call voting and agenda activities in ways that have important implications for our assessments of its consequences. In particular, they highlight that the polarization that has occurred is less a result of differing priorities between Democrats and Republicans and more a function of different preferences on those priority issues. This differentiation may bubble up in part from the true preferences of the rank-and-file, but it is also likely a function of the polarized choices that are presented to them on roll call votes.

AB - Partisan polarization in legislators' roll call voting is well established. In this article, we examine whether partisan and ideological differentiation extends to legislators' agendas (i.e., the issue content of the bills and resolutions they introduce and cosponsor). Our analyses, focusing on the 101st-110th Congresses, reveal that differentiation occurs both across and within parties (e.g., Democrats and Republicans tend to pursue different issues in their legislative activity, as do moderate and more ideologically extreme copartisans), but that these differences are not typically large in magnitude and did not increase between the late 1980s and late 2000s. These findings suggest that the dynamics of polarization differ for roll call voting and agenda activities in ways that have important implications for our assessments of its consequences. In particular, they highlight that the polarization that has occurred is less a result of differing priorities between Democrats and Republicans and more a function of different preferences on those priority issues. This differentiation may bubble up in part from the true preferences of the rank-and-file, but it is also likely a function of the polarized choices that are presented to them on roll call votes.

KW - Ideology

KW - Introductions and cosponsorships

KW - Legislative agendas

KW - Polarization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906344912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906344912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/pol.2014.9

DO - 10.1057/pol.2014.9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84906344912

VL - 46

SP - 430

EP - 448

JO - Polity

JF - Polity

SN - 0032-3497

IS - 3

ER -