TY - JOUR
T1 - Partisan amplification of risk
T2 - American perceptions of nuclear energy risk in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster
AU - Yeo, Sara K.
AU - Cacciatore, Michael A.
AU - Brossard, Dominique
AU - Scheufele, Dietram A.
AU - Runge, Kristin
AU - Su, Leona Y.
AU - Kim, Jiyoun
AU - Xenos, Michael
AU - Corley, Elizabeth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by grants from the National Science Foundation to the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (Grant No. SES-0937591 ) and the UW-Madison Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center in Templated Synthesis and Assembly at the Nanoscale (Grant No. SES-DMR-0832760 ). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Aim: This study examines risk perceptions toward nuclear power before and after the Fukushima Daiichi disaster using nationally representative survey samples of American adults. Scope: On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 8.4 earthquake, the largest in the nation's history, occurred off the coast of Japan. The earthquake produced a devastating tsunami that flooded areas of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant and resulted in a loss of power to the plant's cooling system. In the weeks that followed, the world watched as Japanese and international nuclear power safety experts scrambled to contain the damage and prevent a full meltdown. Although the Fukushima Daiichi disaster was heavily covered in media, there is little empirical research on how this coverage impacted audience risk perceptions. Our analysis goes beyond examining aggregate risk perceptions, instead focusing on how specific sub-populations responded to the disaster. Conclusion: We found that ideological groups responded differently to the events in Japan. In particular, risk perceptions among conservatives decreased following the incident. Moreover, we found that media use exacerbated these effects. We discuss possible explanations for these findings.
AB - Aim: This study examines risk perceptions toward nuclear power before and after the Fukushima Daiichi disaster using nationally representative survey samples of American adults. Scope: On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 8.4 earthquake, the largest in the nation's history, occurred off the coast of Japan. The earthquake produced a devastating tsunami that flooded areas of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant and resulted in a loss of power to the plant's cooling system. In the weeks that followed, the world watched as Japanese and international nuclear power safety experts scrambled to contain the damage and prevent a full meltdown. Although the Fukushima Daiichi disaster was heavily covered in media, there is little empirical research on how this coverage impacted audience risk perceptions. Our analysis goes beyond examining aggregate risk perceptions, instead focusing on how specific sub-populations responded to the disaster. Conclusion: We found that ideological groups responded differently to the events in Japan. In particular, risk perceptions among conservatives decreased following the incident. Moreover, we found that media use exacerbated these effects. We discuss possible explanations for these findings.
KW - Fukushima
KW - Ideology
KW - Perceptual filters
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893826670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893826670&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.061
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.061
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84893826670
SN - 0301-4215
VL - 67
SP - 727
EP - 736
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
ER -