Part and whole linguistic experience affect recognition memory for multiword sequences

Cassandra L. Jacobs, Gary S Dell, Aaron S Benjamin, Colin Bannard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Low frequency words (like wizard) are better remembered in recognition memory than high frequency words like tree. Previously studied low frequency words are endorsed more often than high-frequency words, and unstudied low frequency lures attract fewer false alarms than high frequency lures. In order to evaluate whether repeated experience of phrases has the same effect as that of words, we tested whether infrequent combinations of words (like psychic nephew) are better recognized than frequent word combinations (like alcoholic beverages). In contrast to single words, people were more biased to endorse high-frequency phrases, but phrase frequency did not affect discrimination between studied and unstudied phrases. When high and low frequency nouns were embedded in adjective-noun phrases of equal frequency (e.g. handsome wizard and premature tree), people were better able to recognize phrases containing low frequency than high frequency nouns. Taken together, the high frequency phrase bias and the low frequency embedded-noun advantage suggest that the recognition of word sequences calls on prior experience with both the specific phrase and its component words.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-58
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume87
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Linguistics
linguistics
Data storage equipment
Alcoholic Beverages
alcoholism
experience
discrimination
trend
Recognition (Psychology)
Alcoholic beverages
Recognition Memory
Discrimination (Psychology)
Word Frequency

Keywords

  • Compositionality
  • Phrase frequency
  • Recognition memory
  • Word frequency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Part and whole linguistic experience affect recognition memory for multiword sequences. / Jacobs, Cassandra L.; Dell, Gary S; Benjamin, Aaron S; Bannard, Colin.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 87, 01.04.2016, p. 38-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b39614a3ca9460ca7af560cc4ce4cbf,
title = "Part and whole linguistic experience affect recognition memory for multiword sequences",
abstract = "Low frequency words (like wizard) are better remembered in recognition memory than high frequency words like tree. Previously studied low frequency words are endorsed more often than high-frequency words, and unstudied low frequency lures attract fewer false alarms than high frequency lures. In order to evaluate whether repeated experience of phrases has the same effect as that of words, we tested whether infrequent combinations of words (like psychic nephew) are better recognized than frequent word combinations (like alcoholic beverages). In contrast to single words, people were more biased to endorse high-frequency phrases, but phrase frequency did not affect discrimination between studied and unstudied phrases. When high and low frequency nouns were embedded in adjective-noun phrases of equal frequency (e.g. handsome wizard and premature tree), people were better able to recognize phrases containing low frequency than high frequency nouns. Taken together, the high frequency phrase bias and the low frequency embedded-noun advantage suggest that the recognition of word sequences calls on prior experience with both the specific phrase and its component words.",
keywords = "Compositionality, Phrase frequency, Recognition memory, Word frequency",
author = "Jacobs, {Cassandra L.} and Dell, {Gary S} and Benjamin, {Aaron S} and Colin Bannard",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "38--58",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Part and whole linguistic experience affect recognition memory for multiword sequences

AU - Jacobs, Cassandra L.

AU - Dell, Gary S

AU - Benjamin, Aaron S

AU - Bannard, Colin

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Low frequency words (like wizard) are better remembered in recognition memory than high frequency words like tree. Previously studied low frequency words are endorsed more often than high-frequency words, and unstudied low frequency lures attract fewer false alarms than high frequency lures. In order to evaluate whether repeated experience of phrases has the same effect as that of words, we tested whether infrequent combinations of words (like psychic nephew) are better recognized than frequent word combinations (like alcoholic beverages). In contrast to single words, people were more biased to endorse high-frequency phrases, but phrase frequency did not affect discrimination between studied and unstudied phrases. When high and low frequency nouns were embedded in adjective-noun phrases of equal frequency (e.g. handsome wizard and premature tree), people were better able to recognize phrases containing low frequency than high frequency nouns. Taken together, the high frequency phrase bias and the low frequency embedded-noun advantage suggest that the recognition of word sequences calls on prior experience with both the specific phrase and its component words.

AB - Low frequency words (like wizard) are better remembered in recognition memory than high frequency words like tree. Previously studied low frequency words are endorsed more often than high-frequency words, and unstudied low frequency lures attract fewer false alarms than high frequency lures. In order to evaluate whether repeated experience of phrases has the same effect as that of words, we tested whether infrequent combinations of words (like psychic nephew) are better recognized than frequent word combinations (like alcoholic beverages). In contrast to single words, people were more biased to endorse high-frequency phrases, but phrase frequency did not affect discrimination between studied and unstudied phrases. When high and low frequency nouns were embedded in adjective-noun phrases of equal frequency (e.g. handsome wizard and premature tree), people were better able to recognize phrases containing low frequency than high frequency nouns. Taken together, the high frequency phrase bias and the low frequency embedded-noun advantage suggest that the recognition of word sequences calls on prior experience with both the specific phrase and its component words.

KW - Compositionality

KW - Phrase frequency

KW - Recognition memory

KW - Word frequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947570912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947570912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947570912

VL - 87

SP - 38

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

ER -