Organizational governance adaptation

Who is in, who is out, and who gets what

Peter G. Klein, Joseph T Mahoney, Anita M. McGahan, Christos N. Pitelis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Governance gives life to an organization by establishing the rules that shape organizational action. Structures of governance rest on stakeholder engagement, particularly on how stakeholders assess the prospects for earning a return by committing their specialized resources to the organization. Once formalized, governance structures and processes can resist change. Yet, under special circumstances, some stakeholders that are a party to an organization may seek to adapt governance in response to changes in the external environment that surrounds the organization. Adaptation often requires renegotiation: who has claims on the organization and who gets what? In this article we analyze the relationship between the institutional change that drives adaptation and the outcome of renegotiation. We draw on institutional economics and organization theory to identify four pathways of governance adaptation: continuity, architectural change, enfranchisement change, and redistribution. We call for further theoretical and empirical research on governance adaptation and its implications for organizational value creation and capture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-27
Number of pages22
JournalAcademy of Management Review
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Organizational governance
Governance
Economics
Stakeholders
Renegotiation
Value creation
Continuity
Value capture
Empirical research
Governance structure
Organizational values
Pathway
Stakeholder engagement
Organization theory
Redistribution
Economic theory
Institutional economics
Resources
Institutional change
External environment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Organizational governance adaptation : Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. / Klein, Peter G.; Mahoney, Joseph T; McGahan, Anita M.; Pitelis, Christos N.

In: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 6-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Klein, Peter G. ; Mahoney, Joseph T ; McGahan, Anita M. ; Pitelis, Christos N. / Organizational governance adaptation : Who is in, who is out, and who gets what. In: Academy of Management Review. 2019 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 6-27.
@article{627f701a5f9b4a2f85c4da98acd10952,
title = "Organizational governance adaptation: Who is in, who is out, and who gets what",
abstract = "Governance gives life to an organization by establishing the rules that shape organizational action. Structures of governance rest on stakeholder engagement, particularly on how stakeholders assess the prospects for earning a return by committing their specialized resources to the organization. Once formalized, governance structures and processes can resist change. Yet, under special circumstances, some stakeholders that are a party to an organization may seek to adapt governance in response to changes in the external environment that surrounds the organization. Adaptation often requires renegotiation: who has claims on the organization and who gets what? In this article we analyze the relationship between the institutional change that drives adaptation and the outcome of renegotiation. We draw on institutional economics and organization theory to identify four pathways of governance adaptation: continuity, architectural change, enfranchisement change, and redistribution. We call for further theoretical and empirical research on governance adaptation and its implications for organizational value creation and capture.",
author = "Klein, {Peter G.} and Mahoney, {Joseph T} and McGahan, {Anita M.} and Pitelis, {Christos N.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amr.2014.0459",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "6--27",
journal = "Academy of Management Review",
issn = "0363-7425",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational governance adaptation

T2 - Who is in, who is out, and who gets what

AU - Klein, Peter G.

AU - Mahoney, Joseph T

AU - McGahan, Anita M.

AU - Pitelis, Christos N.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Governance gives life to an organization by establishing the rules that shape organizational action. Structures of governance rest on stakeholder engagement, particularly on how stakeholders assess the prospects for earning a return by committing their specialized resources to the organization. Once formalized, governance structures and processes can resist change. Yet, under special circumstances, some stakeholders that are a party to an organization may seek to adapt governance in response to changes in the external environment that surrounds the organization. Adaptation often requires renegotiation: who has claims on the organization and who gets what? In this article we analyze the relationship between the institutional change that drives adaptation and the outcome of renegotiation. We draw on institutional economics and organization theory to identify four pathways of governance adaptation: continuity, architectural change, enfranchisement change, and redistribution. We call for further theoretical and empirical research on governance adaptation and its implications for organizational value creation and capture.

AB - Governance gives life to an organization by establishing the rules that shape organizational action. Structures of governance rest on stakeholder engagement, particularly on how stakeholders assess the prospects for earning a return by committing their specialized resources to the organization. Once formalized, governance structures and processes can resist change. Yet, under special circumstances, some stakeholders that are a party to an organization may seek to adapt governance in response to changes in the external environment that surrounds the organization. Adaptation often requires renegotiation: who has claims on the organization and who gets what? In this article we analyze the relationship between the institutional change that drives adaptation and the outcome of renegotiation. We draw on institutional economics and organization theory to identify four pathways of governance adaptation: continuity, architectural change, enfranchisement change, and redistribution. We call for further theoretical and empirical research on governance adaptation and its implications for organizational value creation and capture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056311449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056311449&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amr.2014.0459

DO - 10.5465/amr.2014.0459

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 6

EP - 27

JO - Academy of Management Review

JF - Academy of Management Review

SN - 0363-7425

IS - 1

ER -