Oral and written discourse in adolescents with closed head injury

Brenda M. Wilson, Adele Proctor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Analysis of oral and written discourse suggested differing cognitive demands for modes of expression. Verbal samples were provided by 8 adolescents with closed head injury (CHI) and 8 controls. A generation task using a picture stimulus was the basis for discourse. Eight measures [productivity, efficiency, semantic ties (lexical, incomplete, elliptical), maze use, coherence (global, local)] were utilized. A covariate model consisting of group membership (CHI vs control), executive functioning and working memory helps to explain variance in the discourse skills of adolescents with CHI. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)425-429
Number of pages5
JournalBrain and Cognition
Volume43
Issue number1-3
StatePublished - Jun 2000
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral and written discourse in adolescents with closed head injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this