On traits, situations, and their integration: A developmental perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The question of whether the person or the situation is largely responsible for behavior has plagued psychology intermittently for the last half century. Studies of the heritability, stability, and consensual validity of traits have clearly demonstrated the existence of traits. However, there is continuing controversy about the role of traits and situations in the enterprise of personality psychology. The goal of this article is to describe how insights yielded from adopting a developmental approach can foster the successful integration of the person and the situation across the life span. Five key lessons are described: (a) age matters - studying different age groups can lead to biases for and against traits and situations: (b), if age matters, time matters more - longitudinal and within-participant designs demonstrate that traits and situations are reciprocally related: (c) examine multiple types of change - focusing on one type, such as mean-level change, can lead to inappropriate conclusions about the merits of persons or situations: (d) be sensitive to levels of analysis - the relative breadth of persons and situations may determine the relative influence of the two; (e) pay attention to process - process models lead inextricably to transactional explanations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)402-416
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Review
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 31 2004

Fingerprint

Psychology
Personality
Age Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

On traits, situations, and their integration : A developmental perspective. / Roberts, Brent W.; Pomerantz, Eva M.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 4, 31.12.2004, p. 402-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{41001884efd54f2e80ed724f956ad5e8,
title = "On traits, situations, and their integration: A developmental perspective",
abstract = "The question of whether the person or the situation is largely responsible for behavior has plagued psychology intermittently for the last half century. Studies of the heritability, stability, and consensual validity of traits have clearly demonstrated the existence of traits. However, there is continuing controversy about the role of traits and situations in the enterprise of personality psychology. The goal of this article is to describe how insights yielded from adopting a developmental approach can foster the successful integration of the person and the situation across the life span. Five key lessons are described: (a) age matters - studying different age groups can lead to biases for and against traits and situations: (b), if age matters, time matters more - longitudinal and within-participant designs demonstrate that traits and situations are reciprocally related: (c) examine multiple types of change - focusing on one type, such as mean-level change, can lead to inappropriate conclusions about the merits of persons or situations: (d) be sensitive to levels of analysis - the relative breadth of persons and situations may determine the relative influence of the two; (e) pay attention to process - process models lead inextricably to transactional explanations.",
author = "Roberts, {Brent W.} and Pomerantz, {Eva M.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "402--416",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
issn = "1088-8683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On traits, situations, and their integration

T2 - A developmental perspective

AU - Roberts, Brent W.

AU - Pomerantz, Eva M.

PY - 2004/12/31

Y1 - 2004/12/31

N2 - The question of whether the person or the situation is largely responsible for behavior has plagued psychology intermittently for the last half century. Studies of the heritability, stability, and consensual validity of traits have clearly demonstrated the existence of traits. However, there is continuing controversy about the role of traits and situations in the enterprise of personality psychology. The goal of this article is to describe how insights yielded from adopting a developmental approach can foster the successful integration of the person and the situation across the life span. Five key lessons are described: (a) age matters - studying different age groups can lead to biases for and against traits and situations: (b), if age matters, time matters more - longitudinal and within-participant designs demonstrate that traits and situations are reciprocally related: (c) examine multiple types of change - focusing on one type, such as mean-level change, can lead to inappropriate conclusions about the merits of persons or situations: (d) be sensitive to levels of analysis - the relative breadth of persons and situations may determine the relative influence of the two; (e) pay attention to process - process models lead inextricably to transactional explanations.

AB - The question of whether the person or the situation is largely responsible for behavior has plagued psychology intermittently for the last half century. Studies of the heritability, stability, and consensual validity of traits have clearly demonstrated the existence of traits. However, there is continuing controversy about the role of traits and situations in the enterprise of personality psychology. The goal of this article is to describe how insights yielded from adopting a developmental approach can foster the successful integration of the person and the situation across the life span. Five key lessons are described: (a) age matters - studying different age groups can lead to biases for and against traits and situations: (b), if age matters, time matters more - longitudinal and within-participant designs demonstrate that traits and situations are reciprocally related: (c) examine multiple types of change - focusing on one type, such as mean-level change, can lead to inappropriate conclusions about the merits of persons or situations: (d) be sensitive to levels of analysis - the relative breadth of persons and situations may determine the relative influence of the two; (e) pay attention to process - process models lead inextricably to transactional explanations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10844239740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10844239740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_5

DO - 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_5

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15582861

AN - SCOPUS:10844239740

VL - 8

SP - 402

EP - 416

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

SN - 1088-8683

IS - 4

ER -