On the Prospects of a Naturalized Jurisprudence: Review of Brian Leiter, Naturalizing Jurisprudence

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

Abstract

Brian Leiter is one of the leading proponents of the use and application of so-called "naturalistic developments" in contemporary philosophy to central questions in analytic jurisprudence. He is also arguably *the* leading philosophical interpreter of legal realism. In Naturalizing Jurisprudence, he collects many of his most important essays on these topics, organized by theme, and presents previously unpublished responses to critics.

In this Review, I critically examine the three parts of Leiter's book, which address: (1) the philosophical legacy of American legal realism, with specific reference to the nature of justification in adjudication; (2) the appropriate philosophical methodology to determine the nature of law (including what conclusions to draw from this methodology); and (3) the bearing that issues in meta-ethics might have on legal objectivity. Special emphasis is given throughout to the larger prospects for a naturalized jurisprudence, and to how alternative versions of naturalized views might look.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages18
JournalNotre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Volume2010
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Jurisprudence
Realism
Contemporary philosophy
Interpreter
Objectivity
Philosophical Methodology
Justification
Laws of Nature
Methodology
Metaethics
Adjudication

Cite this

@article{664d06b5cbf347c7a6c4632b25cdd7fa,
title = "On the Prospects of a Naturalized Jurisprudence: Review of Brian Leiter, Naturalizing Jurisprudence",
abstract = "Brian Leiter is one of the leading proponents of the use and application of so-called {"}naturalistic developments{"} in contemporary philosophy to central questions in analytic jurisprudence. He is also arguably *the* leading philosophical interpreter of legal realism. In Naturalizing Jurisprudence, he collects many of his most important essays on these topics, organized by theme, and presents previously unpublished responses to critics.In this Review, I critically examine the three parts of Leiter's book, which address: (1) the philosophical legacy of American legal realism, with specific reference to the nature of justification in adjudication; (2) the appropriate philosophical methodology to determine the nature of law (including what conclusions to draw from this methodology); and (3) the bearing that issues in meta-ethics might have on legal objectivity. Special emphasis is given throughout to the larger prospects for a naturalized jurisprudence, and to how alternative versions of naturalized views might look.",
author = "Kar, {Robin B}",
year = "2010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2010",
journal = "Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Prospects of a Naturalized Jurisprudence

T2 - Review of Brian Leiter, Naturalizing Jurisprudence

AU - Kar, Robin B

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Brian Leiter is one of the leading proponents of the use and application of so-called "naturalistic developments" in contemporary philosophy to central questions in analytic jurisprudence. He is also arguably *the* leading philosophical interpreter of legal realism. In Naturalizing Jurisprudence, he collects many of his most important essays on these topics, organized by theme, and presents previously unpublished responses to critics.In this Review, I critically examine the three parts of Leiter's book, which address: (1) the philosophical legacy of American legal realism, with specific reference to the nature of justification in adjudication; (2) the appropriate philosophical methodology to determine the nature of law (including what conclusions to draw from this methodology); and (3) the bearing that issues in meta-ethics might have on legal objectivity. Special emphasis is given throughout to the larger prospects for a naturalized jurisprudence, and to how alternative versions of naturalized views might look.

AB - Brian Leiter is one of the leading proponents of the use and application of so-called "naturalistic developments" in contemporary philosophy to central questions in analytic jurisprudence. He is also arguably *the* leading philosophical interpreter of legal realism. In Naturalizing Jurisprudence, he collects many of his most important essays on these topics, organized by theme, and presents previously unpublished responses to critics.In this Review, I critically examine the three parts of Leiter's book, which address: (1) the philosophical legacy of American legal realism, with specific reference to the nature of justification in adjudication; (2) the appropriate philosophical methodology to determine the nature of law (including what conclusions to draw from this methodology); and (3) the bearing that issues in meta-ethics might have on legal objectivity. Special emphasis is given throughout to the larger prospects for a naturalized jurisprudence, and to how alternative versions of naturalized views might look.

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

VL - 2010

JO - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

JF - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

ER -