On the depletion of Antarctic ozone

Susan Solomon, Rolando R. Garcia, F. Sherwood Rowland, Donald J. Wuebbles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent observations by Farman et al.1 reveal remarkable depletions in the total atmospheric ozone content in Antarctica. The observed total ozone decreased smoothly during the period from about 1975 to the present, but only in the spring season. The observed ozone content at Halley Bay was ~30% lower in the Antarctic spring seasons (October) of 1980-84 than in the springs of 1957-73. No such obvious perturbation is observable in other seasons, or at other than the very highest latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, and the magnitude of the observed change there far exceeds climatological variability2. We present here balloonsonde ozone data3,4 which show that these ozone changes are largely confined to the region from about 10 to 20 km, during the period August to October. We show that homogeneous (gas phase) chemistry as presently understood cannot explain these observed depletions. On the other hand, a unique feature of the Antarctic lower stratosphere is its high frequency of polar stratospheric clouds5, providing a reaction site for heterogeneous reactions. A heterogeneous reaction between HCl and ClONO2 is explored as a possible mechanism to explain the ozone observations. This process produces changes in ozone that are consistent with the observations, and its implications for the behaviour of HNO3 and NO2 in the Antarctic stratosphere are consistent with observations of those species there, providing an important check on the proposed mechanism. Similar ozone changes are obtained with another possible heterogeneous reaction, H2O + ClONO2.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)755-758
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume321
Issue number6072
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On the depletion of Antarctic ozone'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this