On methods, methodologies, and continued colonization of knowledge in the study of "ethnic minorities": Comment on Hall et al. (2016)

Oksana Yakushko, Louis Hoffman, Melissa L. Morgan Consoli, Gordon Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Multicultural scholarship continues to reflect unexamined assumptions regarding the exclusive use of natural science methodologies, reliance on dominant Western scientific paradigms, and entrenchment in institutionalized research priorities that privilege efficiency and investigators' career promotion rather than the needs of diverse communities. Current practices in psychological research with ethnic minority groups also may contribute to the potential for epistemological violence, which occurs when scientific investigations are used as a pretext to justify interpretations of data in research with "ethnic minorities" in ways that perpetuate oppression or are lacking in their focus on social action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)890-891
Number of pages2
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume71
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Human sciences
  • Monoculture
  • Multicultural research
  • Social justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On methods, methodologies, and continued colonization of knowledge in the study of "ethnic minorities": Comment on Hall et al. (2016)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this