On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many studies have reported that L2 learners have persistent problems with unaccusative verbs in English, Japanese, Italian, French, and Chinese. Oshita (2001) proposed the “unaccusative trap hypothesis” (UTH) to account for the observed developmental trends crosslinguistically. According to the UTH, initially, L2 learners assume that all intransitive verbs are unergatives. At intermediate and advanced stages, learners realize that unaccusative and unergative verbs have different representations, and typical errors become common. Depending on the robustness of the target language input, advanced L2 learners may or may not reach native-like knowledge. This study tested the UTH with 71 English-speaking learners of Spanish of advanced, intermediate, and low-intermediate proficiency using a grammaticality judgment task. Results partially support the UTH: The lower proficiency group did not discriminate between unaccusatives and unergatives in most constructions; intermediate learners distinguished between unaccusatives and unergatives with most constructions, but also incorrectly accepted passives with unergative verbs, while advanced learners behaved like the native speakers. Analysis by semantic subclasses of unaccusative and unergative verbs indicated that the low level learners were not sensitive to lexical semantics either. Such sensitivity appears to emerge at the intermediate level, a result that lends further empirical support to Sorace's (2000) “unaccusativity hierarchy”.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1153-1190
Number of pages38
JournalLinguistics
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 26 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

semantics
speaking
L2 Acquisition
Intermediate
Unaccusativity
trend
language
Trap
Group
Unergative Verbs
Unaccusative Verbs
L2 Learners
Proficiency
Unaccusatives
Lexical Semantics
Language
Native Speaker
Intransitive Verbs
Robustness
Grammaticality Judgments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition. / Montrul, Silvina Andrea.

In: Linguistics, Vol. 43, No. 6, 26.10.2005, p. 1153-1190.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e7997393c50465f98e0c17c71b17fcb,
title = "On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition",
abstract = "Many studies have reported that L2 learners have persistent problems with unaccusative verbs in English, Japanese, Italian, French, and Chinese. Oshita (2001) proposed the “unaccusative trap hypothesis” (UTH) to account for the observed developmental trends crosslinguistically. According to the UTH, initially, L2 learners assume that all intransitive verbs are unergatives. At intermediate and advanced stages, learners realize that unaccusative and unergative verbs have different representations, and typical errors become common. Depending on the robustness of the target language input, advanced L2 learners may or may not reach native-like knowledge. This study tested the UTH with 71 English-speaking learners of Spanish of advanced, intermediate, and low-intermediate proficiency using a grammaticality judgment task. Results partially support the UTH: The lower proficiency group did not discriminate between unaccusatives and unergatives in most constructions; intermediate learners distinguished between unaccusatives and unergatives with most constructions, but also incorrectly accepted passives with unergative verbs, while advanced learners behaved like the native speakers. Analysis by semantic subclasses of unaccusative and unergative verbs indicated that the low level learners were not sensitive to lexical semantics either. Such sensitivity appears to emerge at the intermediate level, a result that lends further empirical support to Sorace's (2000) “unaccusativity hierarchy”.",
author = "Montrul, {Silvina Andrea}",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/ling.2005.43.6.1153",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1153--1190",
journal = "Linguistics",
issn = "0024-3949",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition

AU - Montrul, Silvina Andrea

PY - 2005/10/26

Y1 - 2005/10/26

N2 - Many studies have reported that L2 learners have persistent problems with unaccusative verbs in English, Japanese, Italian, French, and Chinese. Oshita (2001) proposed the “unaccusative trap hypothesis” (UTH) to account for the observed developmental trends crosslinguistically. According to the UTH, initially, L2 learners assume that all intransitive verbs are unergatives. At intermediate and advanced stages, learners realize that unaccusative and unergative verbs have different representations, and typical errors become common. Depending on the robustness of the target language input, advanced L2 learners may or may not reach native-like knowledge. This study tested the UTH with 71 English-speaking learners of Spanish of advanced, intermediate, and low-intermediate proficiency using a grammaticality judgment task. Results partially support the UTH: The lower proficiency group did not discriminate between unaccusatives and unergatives in most constructions; intermediate learners distinguished between unaccusatives and unergatives with most constructions, but also incorrectly accepted passives with unergative verbs, while advanced learners behaved like the native speakers. Analysis by semantic subclasses of unaccusative and unergative verbs indicated that the low level learners were not sensitive to lexical semantics either. Such sensitivity appears to emerge at the intermediate level, a result that lends further empirical support to Sorace's (2000) “unaccusativity hierarchy”.

AB - Many studies have reported that L2 learners have persistent problems with unaccusative verbs in English, Japanese, Italian, French, and Chinese. Oshita (2001) proposed the “unaccusative trap hypothesis” (UTH) to account for the observed developmental trends crosslinguistically. According to the UTH, initially, L2 learners assume that all intransitive verbs are unergatives. At intermediate and advanced stages, learners realize that unaccusative and unergative verbs have different representations, and typical errors become common. Depending on the robustness of the target language input, advanced L2 learners may or may not reach native-like knowledge. This study tested the UTH with 71 English-speaking learners of Spanish of advanced, intermediate, and low-intermediate proficiency using a grammaticality judgment task. Results partially support the UTH: The lower proficiency group did not discriminate between unaccusatives and unergatives in most constructions; intermediate learners distinguished between unaccusatives and unergatives with most constructions, but also incorrectly accepted passives with unergative verbs, while advanced learners behaved like the native speakers. Analysis by semantic subclasses of unaccusative and unergative verbs indicated that the low level learners were not sensitive to lexical semantics either. Such sensitivity appears to emerge at the intermediate level, a result that lends further empirical support to Sorace's (2000) “unaccusativity hierarchy”.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749051983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749051983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/ling.2005.43.6.1153

DO - 10.1515/ling.2005.43.6.1153

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749051983

VL - 43

SP - 1153

EP - 1190

JO - Linguistics

JF - Linguistics

SN - 0024-3949

IS - 6

ER -