On Forgotten Shores: Migration in Middle East Studies and the Middle East in Migration Studies

Andrew Arsan, John Karam, Akram Khater

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

For all their apparent differences, the colonial and nationalist discourses of the twentieth century shared a vision of the world as an aggregate of discrete bundles of land and people, hermetic units sealed off from one another and defined by their particularities. Whether they spoke in terms of nations or empires, regions or civilizations, they worked to produce the reality they described – one of bounded territories and populations, each one neatly delineated and differentiated from the next. In so doing, they created truncated histories, narrowed-down narratives shorn of wider connections. In the following pages, we will address the implications of such schemes for Middle Eastern studies, and propose an alternative, diasporic vision of this field. A consideration of the population movements that have marked the modern history of the “Middle East” can open up new avenues and approaches for research, and put into question the implicit stress upon fixity and enclosure which still underpins scholarship on the region.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
JournalMashriq & Mahjar Journal of Middle East and North African Migration Studies
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • migration
  • diaspora
  • Middle Eastern studies
  • Middle East
  • modern history
  • fixity
  • enclosure

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On Forgotten Shores: Migration in Middle East Studies and the Middle East in Migration Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this