On experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy: a reply to Sorell

Justin Sytsma, Jonathan Livengood

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In this paper, we reply to Tom Sorell’s criticism of our engagement with the history of philosophy in our book, The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. We explain why our uses of the history of philosophy are not undermined by Sorell’s criticism and why our position is not threatened by the dilemma Sorell advances. We argue that Sorell has mischaracterized the dialectical context of our discussion of the history of philosophy and that he has mistakenly treated our use of the history of philosophy as univocal, when in fact we called on the history of philosophy in several different ways in our text.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-647
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2019

Fingerprint

Experimental philosophy
History of philosophy
Criticism

Keywords

  • Experimental philosophy
  • Tom Sorell
  • history of philosophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Cite this

On experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy : a reply to Sorell. / Sytsma, Justin; Livengood, Jonathan.

In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 635-647.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

@article{9be3160c34b14f299b6995dc863b4b11,
title = "On experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy: a reply to Sorell",
abstract = "In this paper, we reply to Tom Sorell’s criticism of our engagement with the history of philosophy in our book, The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. We explain why our uses of the history of philosophy are not undermined by Sorell’s criticism and why our position is not threatened by the dilemma Sorell advances. We argue that Sorell has mischaracterized the dialectical context of our discussion of the history of philosophy and that he has mistakenly treated our use of the history of philosophy as univocal, when in fact we called on the history of philosophy in several different ways in our text.",
keywords = "Experimental philosophy, Tom Sorell, history of philosophy",
author = "Justin Sytsma and Jonathan Livengood",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/09608788.2018.1539946",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "635--647",
journal = "British Journal for the History of Philosophy",
issn = "0960-8788",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy

T2 - a reply to Sorell

AU - Sytsma, Justin

AU - Livengood, Jonathan

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - In this paper, we reply to Tom Sorell’s criticism of our engagement with the history of philosophy in our book, The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. We explain why our uses of the history of philosophy are not undermined by Sorell’s criticism and why our position is not threatened by the dilemma Sorell advances. We argue that Sorell has mischaracterized the dialectical context of our discussion of the history of philosophy and that he has mistakenly treated our use of the history of philosophy as univocal, when in fact we called on the history of philosophy in several different ways in our text.

AB - In this paper, we reply to Tom Sorell’s criticism of our engagement with the history of philosophy in our book, The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. We explain why our uses of the history of philosophy are not undermined by Sorell’s criticism and why our position is not threatened by the dilemma Sorell advances. We argue that Sorell has mischaracterized the dialectical context of our discussion of the history of philosophy and that he has mistakenly treated our use of the history of philosophy as univocal, when in fact we called on the history of philosophy in several different ways in our text.

KW - Experimental philosophy

KW - Tom Sorell

KW - history of philosophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058375238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058375238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09608788.2018.1539946

DO - 10.1080/09608788.2018.1539946

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85058375238

VL - 27

SP - 635

EP - 647

JO - British Journal for the History of Philosophy

JF - British Journal for the History of Philosophy

SN - 0960-8788

IS - 3

ER -