On discriminating between GCM forcing configurations using Bayesian reconstructions of late-holocene temperatures

Martin Tingley, Peter F. Craigmile, Murali Haran, Bo Li, Elizabeth Mannshardt, Bala Rajaratnam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Several climate modeling groups have recently generated ensembles of last-millennium climate simulations under different forcing scenarios. These experiments represent an ideal opportunity to establish the baseline feasibility of using proxy-based reconstructions of late-Holocene climate as out-of-calibration tests of the fidelity of the general circulation models used to project future climate. This paper develops a formal statistical model for assessing the agreement between members of an ensemble of climate simulations and the ensemble of possible climate histories produced from a hierarchical Bayesian climate reconstruction. As the internal variabilities of the simulated and reconstructed climate are decoupled from one another, the comparison is between the two latent, or unobserved, forced responses. Comparisons of the spatial average of a 600-yr high northern latitude temperature reconstruction to suites of last-millennium climate simulations from the GISS-E2 and CSIRO models, respectively, suggest that the proxy-based reconstructions are able to discriminate only between the crudest features of the simulations within each ensemble. Although one of the three volcanic forcing scenarios used in the GISS-E2 ensemble results in superior agreement with the reconstruction, no meaningful distinctions can be made between simulations performed with different estimates of solar forcing or land cover changes. In the case of the CSIRO model, sequentially adding orbital, greenhouse gas, solar, and volcanic forcings to the simulations generally improves overall consensus with the reconstruction, though the distinctions are not individually significant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8264-8281
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Climate
Volume28
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

general circulation model
Holocene
climate
temperature
simulation
climate modeling
land cover
greenhouse gas
calibration
history
experiment

Keywords

  • Bayesian methods
  • Model evaluation/performance
  • Paleoclimate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

On discriminating between GCM forcing configurations using Bayesian reconstructions of late-holocene temperatures. / Tingley, Martin; Craigmile, Peter F.; Haran, Murali; Li, Bo; Mannshardt, Elizabeth; Rajaratnam, Bala.

In: Journal of Climate, Vol. 28, No. 20, 01.01.2015, p. 8264-8281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tingley, Martin ; Craigmile, Peter F. ; Haran, Murali ; Li, Bo ; Mannshardt, Elizabeth ; Rajaratnam, Bala. / On discriminating between GCM forcing configurations using Bayesian reconstructions of late-holocene temperatures. In: Journal of Climate. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 20. pp. 8264-8281.
@article{adefb51a8859481a9222fa669b5d34b8,
title = "On discriminating between GCM forcing configurations using Bayesian reconstructions of late-holocene temperatures",
abstract = "Several climate modeling groups have recently generated ensembles of last-millennium climate simulations under different forcing scenarios. These experiments represent an ideal opportunity to establish the baseline feasibility of using proxy-based reconstructions of late-Holocene climate as out-of-calibration tests of the fidelity of the general circulation models used to project future climate. This paper develops a formal statistical model for assessing the agreement between members of an ensemble of climate simulations and the ensemble of possible climate histories produced from a hierarchical Bayesian climate reconstruction. As the internal variabilities of the simulated and reconstructed climate are decoupled from one another, the comparison is between the two latent, or unobserved, forced responses. Comparisons of the spatial average of a 600-yr high northern latitude temperature reconstruction to suites of last-millennium climate simulations from the GISS-E2 and CSIRO models, respectively, suggest that the proxy-based reconstructions are able to discriminate only between the crudest features of the simulations within each ensemble. Although one of the three volcanic forcing scenarios used in the GISS-E2 ensemble results in superior agreement with the reconstruction, no meaningful distinctions can be made between simulations performed with different estimates of solar forcing or land cover changes. In the case of the CSIRO model, sequentially adding orbital, greenhouse gas, solar, and volcanic forcings to the simulations generally improves overall consensus with the reconstruction, though the distinctions are not individually significant.",
keywords = "Bayesian methods, Model evaluation/performance, Paleoclimate",
author = "Martin Tingley and Craigmile, {Peter F.} and Murali Haran and Bo Li and Elizabeth Mannshardt and Bala Rajaratnam",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0208.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "8264--8281",
journal = "Journal of Climate",
issn = "0894-8755",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "20",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On discriminating between GCM forcing configurations using Bayesian reconstructions of late-holocene temperatures

AU - Tingley, Martin

AU - Craigmile, Peter F.

AU - Haran, Murali

AU - Li, Bo

AU - Mannshardt, Elizabeth

AU - Rajaratnam, Bala

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Several climate modeling groups have recently generated ensembles of last-millennium climate simulations under different forcing scenarios. These experiments represent an ideal opportunity to establish the baseline feasibility of using proxy-based reconstructions of late-Holocene climate as out-of-calibration tests of the fidelity of the general circulation models used to project future climate. This paper develops a formal statistical model for assessing the agreement between members of an ensemble of climate simulations and the ensemble of possible climate histories produced from a hierarchical Bayesian climate reconstruction. As the internal variabilities of the simulated and reconstructed climate are decoupled from one another, the comparison is between the two latent, or unobserved, forced responses. Comparisons of the spatial average of a 600-yr high northern latitude temperature reconstruction to suites of last-millennium climate simulations from the GISS-E2 and CSIRO models, respectively, suggest that the proxy-based reconstructions are able to discriminate only between the crudest features of the simulations within each ensemble. Although one of the three volcanic forcing scenarios used in the GISS-E2 ensemble results in superior agreement with the reconstruction, no meaningful distinctions can be made between simulations performed with different estimates of solar forcing or land cover changes. In the case of the CSIRO model, sequentially adding orbital, greenhouse gas, solar, and volcanic forcings to the simulations generally improves overall consensus with the reconstruction, though the distinctions are not individually significant.

AB - Several climate modeling groups have recently generated ensembles of last-millennium climate simulations under different forcing scenarios. These experiments represent an ideal opportunity to establish the baseline feasibility of using proxy-based reconstructions of late-Holocene climate as out-of-calibration tests of the fidelity of the general circulation models used to project future climate. This paper develops a formal statistical model for assessing the agreement between members of an ensemble of climate simulations and the ensemble of possible climate histories produced from a hierarchical Bayesian climate reconstruction. As the internal variabilities of the simulated and reconstructed climate are decoupled from one another, the comparison is between the two latent, or unobserved, forced responses. Comparisons of the spatial average of a 600-yr high northern latitude temperature reconstruction to suites of last-millennium climate simulations from the GISS-E2 and CSIRO models, respectively, suggest that the proxy-based reconstructions are able to discriminate only between the crudest features of the simulations within each ensemble. Although one of the three volcanic forcing scenarios used in the GISS-E2 ensemble results in superior agreement with the reconstruction, no meaningful distinctions can be made between simulations performed with different estimates of solar forcing or land cover changes. In the case of the CSIRO model, sequentially adding orbital, greenhouse gas, solar, and volcanic forcings to the simulations generally improves overall consensus with the reconstruction, though the distinctions are not individually significant.

KW - Bayesian methods

KW - Model evaluation/performance

KW - Paleoclimate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947579728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947579728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0208.1

DO - 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0208.1

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 8264

EP - 8281

JO - Journal of Climate

JF - Journal of Climate

SN - 0894-8755

IS - 20

ER -