Emanuela Ceva and Francesca Pasquali raise excellent questions about my account. In responding to their articles, I aim to clarify the basis for making distinctions among kinds of justice and defend the practical guidance my analysis may offer, despite being demanding in the standards of justice laid out.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)154-158
Number of pages5
JournalNotizie di Politeia
Issue number131
StatePublished - 2018


  • Compromises
  • Human rights
  • Justice
  • Transnational justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'On compromises and kinds of justice: A reply to Ceva and Pasquali'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this