On a generalization of robust supervisory control of discrete event systems

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper we consider a generalization of the robust supervisory control problem introduced by Lin (Lin. 1993), improved by Takai (Takai. 2000; Takai, 2002), Park and Lim (Park and Lim, 2000; Park and Lin, 2002) and Cury and Krogh (Cury and Krogh, 1999). Following the formalism in (Lin, 1993), we suppose tbe plant language L(G) ⊆ Σ belongs to a finite collection of non-empty, prefix-closed languages L(G) € {L1,L-2,.. .,Ln}, where L,(0) ⊆ Σ,1 € {1,2,...,n). The event-set Σ is partitioned into controllable (Σc) and uncontrollable (Σu) subsets respectively. We assume all events are observable, and the supervisor has no prior knowledge as to the vakie of L(G) € {Li.Z,2....,Ln}. For each Li ⊆ Σ we suppose there exists a prefix-closed language Ki ⊆ Li We present three conditions that are necessary and sufficient for the existence of a supervisor that enforces K, if the plant language L(G) - Li. It is possible that for a given choice of the sets {L1.L2 Ln} and {K1, K2, ..., Kn}, the conditions identified in this paper are not satisfied. This calls for finding a {K1, K2, -, Kn}, such that i € {1,2,_n}.Ki ⊆ K1 that meets the required conditions, and each Ki satisfies some property that we might be interested in. Tbe search for a satisfactory {K1,K2_,Kn} using the notion of monotone properties is also presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)355-360
Number of pages6
JournalIFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Event10th IFAC/IFORS/IMACS/IFIP Symposium on Large Scale Systems: Theory and Applications, LSS 2004 - Osaka, Japan
Duration: Jul 26 2004Jul 28 2004

Keywords

  • Discrete event systems
  • Inductive learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On a generalization of robust supervisory control of discrete event systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this