Old English Literature and Critical Theory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

From the outset of the theoretical turn in the 1980s and 1990s, Old English studies appeared to be inimical to the adoption of the newer critical practices introduced to the rest of the humanities. Rooted firmly in the traditional methodologies of philology and historicism, scholars of Old English literature resisted the indeterminacy and uncertainty championed by critical theory in the wake of the post-structuralist revolution. They were prudently skeptical of applying models of subjectivity, sexuality, and identity developed in modern contexts to the cultural products of an era whose belief systems and modes of thought differ dramatically from those of the present day. As a result, it took some time for Anglo-Saxonists to fully embrace the new critical tools that have by now become part of established practice in literary studies. Today, however, it is rare to find work on Old English literature that does not draw in some way on the theoretically informed questions and conversations that animate contemporary humanistic inquiry. Post-structuralism and feminism have been especially productive theoretical models for the study of Old English, but every form of critical theory that has had an impact on the humanities in the last thirty years has likewise impacted Old English studies. In many cases, it is difficult to differentiate among varying theoretical categories; scholarly work frequently combines models, such as feminism and psychoanalysis, or deconstruction and historicism, to tease out the nuanced implications of a text. The interdisciplinary nature of Old English studies introduces further complications, as scholars frequently reference history, theology, art history, archaeology, and other disciplines in the course of a literary study. As a result, the selections and categories in this article may appear somewhat arbitrary, but its focus is on the most influential scholarship on Old English literature that takes a self-consciously theoretical approach. While many of these approaches announce themselves clearly as belonging to a particular school or movement, others employ hybrid or multifaceted methodologies that bridge multiple categories.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies
EditorsPaul E Szarmach
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Old English
Critical Theory
Old English Literature
Literary Studies
Methodology
Historicism
Complications
Archaeology
Psychoanalysis
Art History
Theology
Feminism
History
Post-feminism
Deconstruction
Structuralist
Indeterminacy
Poststructuralism
Revolution
1980s

Cite this

Trilling, R. (2016). Old English Literature and Critical Theory. In P. E. Szarmach (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396584-0202

Old English Literature and Critical Theory. / Trilling, Renee.

Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies. ed. / Paul E Szarmach. New York : Oxford University Press, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Trilling, R 2016, Old English Literature and Critical Theory. in PE Szarmach (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies. Oxford University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396584-0202
Trilling R. Old English Literature and Critical Theory. In Szarmach PE, editor, Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies. New York: Oxford University Press. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195396584-0202
Trilling, Renee. / Old English Literature and Critical Theory. Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies. editor / Paul E Szarmach. New York : Oxford University Press, 2016.
@inbook{e9f36bd131e448cbb03a2c3191248122,
title = "Old English Literature and Critical Theory",
abstract = "From the outset of the theoretical turn in the 1980s and 1990s, Old English studies appeared to be inimical to the adoption of the newer critical practices introduced to the rest of the humanities. Rooted firmly in the traditional methodologies of philology and historicism, scholars of Old English literature resisted the indeterminacy and uncertainty championed by critical theory in the wake of the post-structuralist revolution. They were prudently skeptical of applying models of subjectivity, sexuality, and identity developed in modern contexts to the cultural products of an era whose belief systems and modes of thought differ dramatically from those of the present day. As a result, it took some time for Anglo-Saxonists to fully embrace the new critical tools that have by now become part of established practice in literary studies. Today, however, it is rare to find work on Old English literature that does not draw in some way on the theoretically informed questions and conversations that animate contemporary humanistic inquiry. Post-structuralism and feminism have been especially productive theoretical models for the study of Old English, but every form of critical theory that has had an impact on the humanities in the last thirty years has likewise impacted Old English studies. In many cases, it is difficult to differentiate among varying theoretical categories; scholarly work frequently combines models, such as feminism and psychoanalysis, or deconstruction and historicism, to tease out the nuanced implications of a text. The interdisciplinary nature of Old English studies introduces further complications, as scholars frequently reference history, theology, art history, archaeology, and other disciplines in the course of a literary study. As a result, the selections and categories in this article may appear somewhat arbitrary, but its focus is on the most influential scholarship on Old English literature that takes a self-consciously theoretical approach. While many of these approaches announce themselves clearly as belonging to a particular school or movement, others employ hybrid or multifaceted methodologies that bridge multiple categories.",
author = "Renee Trilling",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/obo/9780195396584-0202",
language = "English (US)",
editor = "Szarmach, {Paul E}",
booktitle = "Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Old English Literature and Critical Theory

AU - Trilling, Renee

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - From the outset of the theoretical turn in the 1980s and 1990s, Old English studies appeared to be inimical to the adoption of the newer critical practices introduced to the rest of the humanities. Rooted firmly in the traditional methodologies of philology and historicism, scholars of Old English literature resisted the indeterminacy and uncertainty championed by critical theory in the wake of the post-structuralist revolution. They were prudently skeptical of applying models of subjectivity, sexuality, and identity developed in modern contexts to the cultural products of an era whose belief systems and modes of thought differ dramatically from those of the present day. As a result, it took some time for Anglo-Saxonists to fully embrace the new critical tools that have by now become part of established practice in literary studies. Today, however, it is rare to find work on Old English literature that does not draw in some way on the theoretically informed questions and conversations that animate contemporary humanistic inquiry. Post-structuralism and feminism have been especially productive theoretical models for the study of Old English, but every form of critical theory that has had an impact on the humanities in the last thirty years has likewise impacted Old English studies. In many cases, it is difficult to differentiate among varying theoretical categories; scholarly work frequently combines models, such as feminism and psychoanalysis, or deconstruction and historicism, to tease out the nuanced implications of a text. The interdisciplinary nature of Old English studies introduces further complications, as scholars frequently reference history, theology, art history, archaeology, and other disciplines in the course of a literary study. As a result, the selections and categories in this article may appear somewhat arbitrary, but its focus is on the most influential scholarship on Old English literature that takes a self-consciously theoretical approach. While many of these approaches announce themselves clearly as belonging to a particular school or movement, others employ hybrid or multifaceted methodologies that bridge multiple categories.

AB - From the outset of the theoretical turn in the 1980s and 1990s, Old English studies appeared to be inimical to the adoption of the newer critical practices introduced to the rest of the humanities. Rooted firmly in the traditional methodologies of philology and historicism, scholars of Old English literature resisted the indeterminacy and uncertainty championed by critical theory in the wake of the post-structuralist revolution. They were prudently skeptical of applying models of subjectivity, sexuality, and identity developed in modern contexts to the cultural products of an era whose belief systems and modes of thought differ dramatically from those of the present day. As a result, it took some time for Anglo-Saxonists to fully embrace the new critical tools that have by now become part of established practice in literary studies. Today, however, it is rare to find work on Old English literature that does not draw in some way on the theoretically informed questions and conversations that animate contemporary humanistic inquiry. Post-structuralism and feminism have been especially productive theoretical models for the study of Old English, but every form of critical theory that has had an impact on the humanities in the last thirty years has likewise impacted Old English studies. In many cases, it is difficult to differentiate among varying theoretical categories; scholarly work frequently combines models, such as feminism and psychoanalysis, or deconstruction and historicism, to tease out the nuanced implications of a text. The interdisciplinary nature of Old English studies introduces further complications, as scholars frequently reference history, theology, art history, archaeology, and other disciplines in the course of a literary study. As a result, the selections and categories in this article may appear somewhat arbitrary, but its focus is on the most influential scholarship on Old English literature that takes a self-consciously theoretical approach. While many of these approaches announce themselves clearly as belonging to a particular school or movement, others employ hybrid or multifaceted methodologies that bridge multiple categories.

U2 - 10.1093/obo/9780195396584-0202

DO - 10.1093/obo/9780195396584-0202

M3 - Chapter

BT - Oxford Bibliographies in Medieval Studies

A2 - Szarmach, Paul E

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - New York

ER -