Odor and odorous chemical emissions from animal buildings: Part 6. odor activity value

D. B. Parker, J. A. Koziel, L. Cai, L. D. Jacobson, N. Akdeniz, S. D. Bereznicki, T. T. Lim, E. A. Caraway, S. Zhang, S. J. Hoff, A. J. Heber, K. Y. Heathcote, B. P. Hetchler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a growing concern with air and odor emissions from agricultural facilities. A supplementary research project was conducted to complement the U.S. National Air Emissions Monitoring Study (NAEMS). The overall goal of the project was to establish odor and chemical emission factors for animal feeding operations. The study was conducted over a 17-month period at two freestall dairies, one swine sow farm, and one swine finisher facility. Samples from a representative exhaust airstream at each barn were collected in 10 L Tedlar bags and analyzed by trained human panelists using dynamic triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Samples were simultaneously analyzed for 20 odorous compounds (acetic acid, propanoic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, valeric acid, isovaleric acid, hexanoic acid, heptanoic acid, guaiacol, phenol, 4- methylphenol, 4-ethylphenol, 2-aminoacetophenone, indole, skatole, dimethyl disulfide, diethyl disulfide, dimethyl trisulfide, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia). In this article, which is part 6 of a six-part series summarizing results of the project, we investigate the correlations between odor concentrations and odor activity value (OAV), defined as the concentration of a single compound divided by the odor threshold for that compound. The specific objectives were to determine which compounds contributed most to the overall odor emanating from swine and dairy buildings, and develop equations for predicting odor concentration based on compound OAVs. Single-compound odor thresholds (SCOT) were statistically summarized and analyzed, and OAVs were calculated for all compounds. Odor concentrations were regressed against OAV values using multivariate regression techniques. Both swine sites had four common compounds with the highest OAVs (ranked high to low: hydrogen sulfide, 4-methylphenol, butyric acid, isovaleric acid). The dairy sites had these same four compounds in common in the top five, and in addition diethyl disulfide was ranked second at one dairy site, while ammonia was ranked third at the other dairy site. Summed OAVs were not a good predictor of odor concentration (R 2 = 0.16 to 0.52), underestimating actual odor concentrations by 2 to 3 times. Based on the OAV and regression analyses, we conclude that hydrogen sulfide, 4- methylphenol, isovaleric acid, ammonia, and diethyl disulfide are the most likely contributors to swine odor, while hydrogen sulfide, 4-methyl phenol, butyric acid, and isovaleric acid are the most likely contributors to dairy odors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2357-2368
Number of pages12
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume55
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Detection threshold
  • Dilutions to threshold
  • Odor threshold
  • Regression
  • VFA
  • VOC.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Food Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Odor and odorous chemical emissions from animal buildings: Part 6. odor activity value'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Parker, D. B., Koziel, J. A., Cai, L., Jacobson, L. D., Akdeniz, N., Bereznicki, S. D., Lim, T. T., Caraway, E. A., Zhang, S., Hoff, S. J., Heber, A. J., Heathcote, K. Y., & Hetchler, B. P. (2012). Odor and odorous chemical emissions from animal buildings: Part 6. odor activity value. Transactions of the ASABE, 55(6), 2357-2368.