Object Permanence in Young Infants: Further Evidence

Renée Baillargeon, Julie DeVos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that 4.5‐ and even 3.5‐month‐old infants realize that objects continue to exist when hidden. The goal of the present experiments was to obtain converging evidence of object permanence in young infants. Experiments were conducted using paradigms previously used to demonstrate object permanence in 5.5‐month‐old infants and 6.5‐month‐old infants. In one experiment, 3.5‐month‐old infants watched a short or a tall carrot slide along a track. The track's center was hidden by a screen with a large window in its upper half. The short carrot was shorter than the window's lower edge and so did not appear in the window when passing behind the screen; the tall carrot was taller than the window's lower edge and hence should have appeared in the window but did not. The infants looked reliably longer at the tall than at the short carrot event, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence, height, and trajectory of each carrot behind the screen and (b) expected the tall carrot to appear in the screen window and were surprised that it did not. Control trials supported this interpretation. In another experiment, 4.0‐month‐old infants saw a toy car roll along a track that was partly hidden by a screen. A large toy mouse was placed behind the screen, either on top or in back of the track. The female infants looked reliably longer when the mouse stood on top as opposed to in back of the track, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence and trajectory of the car behind the screen, (b) represented the existence and location of the mouse behind the screen, and (c) were surprised to see the car reappear from behind the screen when the mouse stood in its path. A second experiment supported this interpretation. The results of these experiments provide further evidence that infants aged 3.5 months and older are able to represent and to reason about hidden objects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1227-1246
Number of pages20
JournalChild development
Volume62
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1991

Fingerprint

infant
Daucus carota
evidence
experiment
Play and Playthings
toy
interpretation
paradigm
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Object Permanence in Young Infants : Further Evidence. / Baillargeon, Renée; DeVos, Julie.

In: Child development, Vol. 62, No. 6, 12.1991, p. 1227-1246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baillargeon, Renée ; DeVos, Julie. / Object Permanence in Young Infants : Further Evidence. In: Child development. 1991 ; Vol. 62, No. 6. pp. 1227-1246.
@article{e6c7ec330c7743cea089cafce8260818,
title = "Object Permanence in Young Infants: Further Evidence",
abstract = "Recent evidence suggests that 4.5‐ and even 3.5‐month‐old infants realize that objects continue to exist when hidden. The goal of the present experiments was to obtain converging evidence of object permanence in young infants. Experiments were conducted using paradigms previously used to demonstrate object permanence in 5.5‐month‐old infants and 6.5‐month‐old infants. In one experiment, 3.5‐month‐old infants watched a short or a tall carrot slide along a track. The track's center was hidden by a screen with a large window in its upper half. The short carrot was shorter than the window's lower edge and so did not appear in the window when passing behind the screen; the tall carrot was taller than the window's lower edge and hence should have appeared in the window but did not. The infants looked reliably longer at the tall than at the short carrot event, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence, height, and trajectory of each carrot behind the screen and (b) expected the tall carrot to appear in the screen window and were surprised that it did not. Control trials supported this interpretation. In another experiment, 4.0‐month‐old infants saw a toy car roll along a track that was partly hidden by a screen. A large toy mouse was placed behind the screen, either on top or in back of the track. The female infants looked reliably longer when the mouse stood on top as opposed to in back of the track, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence and trajectory of the car behind the screen, (b) represented the existence and location of the mouse behind the screen, and (c) were surprised to see the car reappear from behind the screen when the mouse stood in its path. A second experiment supported this interpretation. The results of these experiments provide further evidence that infants aged 3.5 months and older are able to represent and to reason about hidden objects.",
author = "Ren{\'e}e Baillargeon and Julie DeVos",
year = "1991",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01602.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "1227--1246",
journal = "Child Development",
issn = "0009-3920",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Object Permanence in Young Infants

T2 - Further Evidence

AU - Baillargeon, Renée

AU - DeVos, Julie

PY - 1991/12

Y1 - 1991/12

N2 - Recent evidence suggests that 4.5‐ and even 3.5‐month‐old infants realize that objects continue to exist when hidden. The goal of the present experiments was to obtain converging evidence of object permanence in young infants. Experiments were conducted using paradigms previously used to demonstrate object permanence in 5.5‐month‐old infants and 6.5‐month‐old infants. In one experiment, 3.5‐month‐old infants watched a short or a tall carrot slide along a track. The track's center was hidden by a screen with a large window in its upper half. The short carrot was shorter than the window's lower edge and so did not appear in the window when passing behind the screen; the tall carrot was taller than the window's lower edge and hence should have appeared in the window but did not. The infants looked reliably longer at the tall than at the short carrot event, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence, height, and trajectory of each carrot behind the screen and (b) expected the tall carrot to appear in the screen window and were surprised that it did not. Control trials supported this interpretation. In another experiment, 4.0‐month‐old infants saw a toy car roll along a track that was partly hidden by a screen. A large toy mouse was placed behind the screen, either on top or in back of the track. The female infants looked reliably longer when the mouse stood on top as opposed to in back of the track, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence and trajectory of the car behind the screen, (b) represented the existence and location of the mouse behind the screen, and (c) were surprised to see the car reappear from behind the screen when the mouse stood in its path. A second experiment supported this interpretation. The results of these experiments provide further evidence that infants aged 3.5 months and older are able to represent and to reason about hidden objects.

AB - Recent evidence suggests that 4.5‐ and even 3.5‐month‐old infants realize that objects continue to exist when hidden. The goal of the present experiments was to obtain converging evidence of object permanence in young infants. Experiments were conducted using paradigms previously used to demonstrate object permanence in 5.5‐month‐old infants and 6.5‐month‐old infants. In one experiment, 3.5‐month‐old infants watched a short or a tall carrot slide along a track. The track's center was hidden by a screen with a large window in its upper half. The short carrot was shorter than the window's lower edge and so did not appear in the window when passing behind the screen; the tall carrot was taller than the window's lower edge and hence should have appeared in the window but did not. The infants looked reliably longer at the tall than at the short carrot event, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence, height, and trajectory of each carrot behind the screen and (b) expected the tall carrot to appear in the screen window and were surprised that it did not. Control trials supported this interpretation. In another experiment, 4.0‐month‐old infants saw a toy car roll along a track that was partly hidden by a screen. A large toy mouse was placed behind the screen, either on top or in back of the track. The female infants looked reliably longer when the mouse stood on top as opposed to in back of the track, suggesting that they (a) represented the existence and trajectory of the car behind the screen, (b) represented the existence and location of the mouse behind the screen, and (c) were surprised to see the car reappear from behind the screen when the mouse stood in its path. A second experiment supported this interpretation. The results of these experiments provide further evidence that infants aged 3.5 months and older are able to represent and to reason about hidden objects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026309701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026309701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01602.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01602.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 1786712

AN - SCOPUS:0026309701

VL - 62

SP - 1227

EP - 1246

JO - Child Development

JF - Child Development

SN - 0009-3920

IS - 6

ER -