Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy: An Integrative Account

Renee L Baillargeon, Maayan Stavans, Di Wu, Yael Gertner, Peipei Setoh, Audrey K. Kittredge, Amélie Bernard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end of the first year that infants detect a violation when a single object is revealed. Since then, a large number of investigations have modified the standard task in various ways and found that young infants succeed with some but not with other modifications, yielding a complex and unwieldy picture. In this article, we argue that this confusing picture can be better understood by bringing to bear insights from a related subfield of infancy research, physical reasoning. By considering how infants reason about object information within and across physical events, we can make sense of apparently inconsistent findings from different object-individuation tasks. In turn, object-individuation findings deepen our understanding of how physical reasoning develops in infancy. Integrating the insights from physical-reasoning and object-individuation investigations thus enriches both subfields and brings about a clearer account of how infants represent objects and events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-46
Number of pages43
JournalLanguage Learning and Development
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

personality development
infant
Physical
Infancy
Object Individuation
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy : An Integrative Account. / Baillargeon, Renee L; Stavans, Maayan; Wu, Di; Gertner, Yael; Setoh, Peipei; Kittredge, Audrey K.; Bernard, Amélie.

In: Language Learning and Development, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 4-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baillargeon, Renee L ; Stavans, Maayan ; Wu, Di ; Gertner, Yael ; Setoh, Peipei ; Kittredge, Audrey K. ; Bernard, Amélie. / Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy : An Integrative Account. In: Language Learning and Development. 2012 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 4-46.
@article{f8ae5e1f3aa74abab7903be9e1c36864,
title = "Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy: An Integrative Account",
abstract = "Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end of the first year that infants detect a violation when a single object is revealed. Since then, a large number of investigations have modified the standard task in various ways and found that young infants succeed with some but not with other modifications, yielding a complex and unwieldy picture. In this article, we argue that this confusing picture can be better understood by bringing to bear insights from a related subfield of infancy research, physical reasoning. By considering how infants reason about object information within and across physical events, we can make sense of apparently inconsistent findings from different object-individuation tasks. In turn, object-individuation findings deepen our understanding of how physical reasoning develops in infancy. Integrating the insights from physical-reasoning and object-individuation investigations thus enriches both subfields and brings about a clearer account of how infants represent objects and events.",
author = "Baillargeon, {Renee L} and Maayan Stavans and Di Wu and Yael Gertner and Peipei Setoh and Kittredge, {Audrey K.} and Am{\'e}lie Bernard",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15475441.2012.630610",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "4--46",
journal = "Language Learning and Development",
issn = "1547-5441",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy

T2 - An Integrative Account

AU - Baillargeon, Renee L

AU - Stavans, Maayan

AU - Wu, Di

AU - Gertner, Yael

AU - Setoh, Peipei

AU - Kittredge, Audrey K.

AU - Bernard, Amélie

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end of the first year that infants detect a violation when a single object is revealed. Since then, a large number of investigations have modified the standard task in various ways and found that young infants succeed with some but not with other modifications, yielding a complex and unwieldy picture. In this article, we argue that this confusing picture can be better understood by bringing to bear insights from a related subfield of infancy research, physical reasoning. By considering how infants reason about object information within and across physical events, we can make sense of apparently inconsistent findings from different object-individuation tasks. In turn, object-individuation findings deepen our understanding of how physical reasoning develops in infancy. Integrating the insights from physical-reasoning and object-individuation investigations thus enriches both subfields and brings about a clearer account of how infants represent objects and events.

AB - Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end of the first year that infants detect a violation when a single object is revealed. Since then, a large number of investigations have modified the standard task in various ways and found that young infants succeed with some but not with other modifications, yielding a complex and unwieldy picture. In this article, we argue that this confusing picture can be better understood by bringing to bear insights from a related subfield of infancy research, physical reasoning. By considering how infants reason about object information within and across physical events, we can make sense of apparently inconsistent findings from different object-individuation tasks. In turn, object-individuation findings deepen our understanding of how physical reasoning develops in infancy. Integrating the insights from physical-reasoning and object-individuation investigations thus enriches both subfields and brings about a clearer account of how infants represent objects and events.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855919267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855919267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15475441.2012.630610

DO - 10.1080/15475441.2012.630610

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84855919267

VL - 8

SP - 4

EP - 46

JO - Language Learning and Development

JF - Language Learning and Development

SN - 1547-5441

IS - 1

ER -