Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration

Adel E. Abdelnaby, Thomas M. Frankie, Amr S. Elnashai, Billie F. Spencer, Daniel A. Kuchma, Pedro Silva, Chia Ming Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers are subjected to combined loading conditions resulting from complex earthquake ground motions coupled with irregular geometry and asymmetry of the bridge structure. Furthermore, the influence of the assumptions and simplifications made in modeling irregular and curved bridges on the reliability of their resulting response data is still not fully known. For that purpose, in this paper a hybrid simulation test is conducted on a curved four-span bridge. This test accounts for the three-dimensional (3D) system-level interaction between the three experimental piers in two testing facilities with the numerical models of the deck, restraints and abutments. Prior to the hybrid simulation, a detailed numerical finite element, fiber-based model of the whole bridge system is established. The analytical predictions of this model are then used for comparison with the hybrid simulation test results. Discrepancies between the numerical and experimental results of the bridge piers response are highlighted and deficiencies in the numerical model assumptions are discussed. A rigorous numerical model calibration procedure is then followed to adjust for the initial modeling assumptions and improve the bridge model overall response. This study has proven that some modeling assumptions that are widely used in seismic analysis of bridge structures are unrealistic and therefore may lead to inaccurate results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-245
Number of pages12
JournalEngineering Structures
Volume70
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2014

Fingerprint

Numerical models
Calibration
Bridge piers
Concrete bridges
Piers
Reinforced concrete
Earthquakes
Geometry
Fibers
Testing

Keywords

  • Combined actions
  • Curved bridge
  • Hybrid simulation
  • Multi-directional loading
  • Numerical model calibration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration. / Abdelnaby, Adel E.; Frankie, Thomas M.; Elnashai, Amr S.; Spencer, Billie F.; Kuchma, Daniel A.; Silva, Pedro; Chang, Chia Ming.

In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 70, 01.07.2014, p. 234-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdelnaby, Adel E. ; Frankie, Thomas M. ; Elnashai, Amr S. ; Spencer, Billie F. ; Kuchma, Daniel A. ; Silva, Pedro ; Chang, Chia Ming. / Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration. In: Engineering Structures. 2014 ; Vol. 70. pp. 234-245.
@article{54f55381d45d465589441250646e0b47,
title = "Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration",
abstract = "Reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers are subjected to combined loading conditions resulting from complex earthquake ground motions coupled with irregular geometry and asymmetry of the bridge structure. Furthermore, the influence of the assumptions and simplifications made in modeling irregular and curved bridges on the reliability of their resulting response data is still not fully known. For that purpose, in this paper a hybrid simulation test is conducted on a curved four-span bridge. This test accounts for the three-dimensional (3D) system-level interaction between the three experimental piers in two testing facilities with the numerical models of the deck, restraints and abutments. Prior to the hybrid simulation, a detailed numerical finite element, fiber-based model of the whole bridge system is established. The analytical predictions of this model are then used for comparison with the hybrid simulation test results. Discrepancies between the numerical and experimental results of the bridge piers response are highlighted and deficiencies in the numerical model assumptions are discussed. A rigorous numerical model calibration procedure is then followed to adjust for the initial modeling assumptions and improve the bridge model overall response. This study has proven that some modeling assumptions that are widely used in seismic analysis of bridge structures are unrealistic and therefore may lead to inaccurate results.",
keywords = "Combined actions, Curved bridge, Hybrid simulation, Multi-directional loading, Numerical model calibration",
author = "Abdelnaby, {Adel E.} and Frankie, {Thomas M.} and Elnashai, {Amr S.} and Spencer, {Billie F.} and Kuchma, {Daniel A.} and Pedro Silva and Chang, {Chia Ming}",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "234--245",
journal = "Engineering Structures",
issn = "0141-0296",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration

AU - Abdelnaby, Adel E.

AU - Frankie, Thomas M.

AU - Elnashai, Amr S.

AU - Spencer, Billie F.

AU - Kuchma, Daniel A.

AU - Silva, Pedro

AU - Chang, Chia Ming

PY - 2014/7/1

Y1 - 2014/7/1

N2 - Reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers are subjected to combined loading conditions resulting from complex earthquake ground motions coupled with irregular geometry and asymmetry of the bridge structure. Furthermore, the influence of the assumptions and simplifications made in modeling irregular and curved bridges on the reliability of their resulting response data is still not fully known. For that purpose, in this paper a hybrid simulation test is conducted on a curved four-span bridge. This test accounts for the three-dimensional (3D) system-level interaction between the three experimental piers in two testing facilities with the numerical models of the deck, restraints and abutments. Prior to the hybrid simulation, a detailed numerical finite element, fiber-based model of the whole bridge system is established. The analytical predictions of this model are then used for comparison with the hybrid simulation test results. Discrepancies between the numerical and experimental results of the bridge piers response are highlighted and deficiencies in the numerical model assumptions are discussed. A rigorous numerical model calibration procedure is then followed to adjust for the initial modeling assumptions and improve the bridge model overall response. This study has proven that some modeling assumptions that are widely used in seismic analysis of bridge structures are unrealistic and therefore may lead to inaccurate results.

AB - Reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers are subjected to combined loading conditions resulting from complex earthquake ground motions coupled with irregular geometry and asymmetry of the bridge structure. Furthermore, the influence of the assumptions and simplifications made in modeling irregular and curved bridges on the reliability of their resulting response data is still not fully known. For that purpose, in this paper a hybrid simulation test is conducted on a curved four-span bridge. This test accounts for the three-dimensional (3D) system-level interaction between the three experimental piers in two testing facilities with the numerical models of the deck, restraints and abutments. Prior to the hybrid simulation, a detailed numerical finite element, fiber-based model of the whole bridge system is established. The analytical predictions of this model are then used for comparison with the hybrid simulation test results. Discrepancies between the numerical and experimental results of the bridge piers response are highlighted and deficiencies in the numerical model assumptions are discussed. A rigorous numerical model calibration procedure is then followed to adjust for the initial modeling assumptions and improve the bridge model overall response. This study has proven that some modeling assumptions that are widely used in seismic analysis of bridge structures are unrealistic and therefore may lead to inaccurate results.

KW - Combined actions

KW - Curved bridge

KW - Hybrid simulation

KW - Multi-directional loading

KW - Numerical model calibration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899572144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899572144&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.009

DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899572144

VL - 70

SP - 234

EP - 245

JO - Engineering Structures

JF - Engineering Structures

SN - 0141-0296

ER -