Numeracy and Legal Decision Making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Health and financial decision-making literatures have chronicled how people’s numerical abilities affect their decisions. Until now, however, there has been no empirical study of whether numeracy — or people’s ability to understand and use numbers — also interacts with legal decision making. This Article presents the first such study, and describes three original findings related to the role of numeracy in legal decision making. First, the study shows a surprisingly high level of math skill among law students, especially given the common folk wisdom that lawyers are bad at math. Second, although prior research in non-legal contexts has shown that people with low numeracy are particularly susceptible to cognitive bias, we detect no significant relationship between law students’ math skills and their susceptibility to bias or framing effects. Finally, and most worryingly, our findings show that the substance of legal analysis varies with math skill for at least some subset of cases.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)191-230
Number of pages41
JournalArizona State Law Journal
Volume46
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

decision making
Law
ability
trend
lawyer
wisdom
student
health
literature

Keywords

  • Numeracy
  • math skill
  • legal decisionmaking
  • Law and psychology
  • Decision making
  • attorney or lawyer error
  • perception of risk
  • empirical legal studies
  • inefficient precautions
  • Hand formula

Cite this

Numeracy and Legal Decision Making. / Rowell, Kristen Arden.

In: Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2014, p. 191-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f2922eebad824d1485a97f17b2408ae8,
title = "Numeracy and Legal Decision Making",
abstract = "Health and financial decision-making literatures have chronicled how people’s numerical abilities affect their decisions. Until now, however, there has been no empirical study of whether numeracy — or people’s ability to understand and use numbers — also interacts with legal decision making. This Article presents the first such study, and describes three original findings related to the role of numeracy in legal decision making. First, the study shows a surprisingly high level of math skill among law students, especially given the common folk wisdom that lawyers are bad at math. Second, although prior research in non-legal contexts has shown that people with low numeracy are particularly susceptible to cognitive bias, we detect no significant relationship between law students’ math skills and their susceptibility to bias or framing effects. Finally, and most worryingly, our findings show that the substance of legal analysis varies with math skill for at least some subset of cases.",
keywords = "Numeracy, math skill, legal decisionmaking, Law and psychology, Decision making, attorney or lawyer error, perception of risk, empirical legal studies, inefficient precautions, Hand formula",
author = "Rowell, {Kristen Arden}",
year = "2014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "191--230",
journal = "Arizona State Law Journal",
issn = "0164-4297",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numeracy and Legal Decision Making

AU - Rowell, Kristen Arden

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Health and financial decision-making literatures have chronicled how people’s numerical abilities affect their decisions. Until now, however, there has been no empirical study of whether numeracy — or people’s ability to understand and use numbers — also interacts with legal decision making. This Article presents the first such study, and describes three original findings related to the role of numeracy in legal decision making. First, the study shows a surprisingly high level of math skill among law students, especially given the common folk wisdom that lawyers are bad at math. Second, although prior research in non-legal contexts has shown that people with low numeracy are particularly susceptible to cognitive bias, we detect no significant relationship between law students’ math skills and their susceptibility to bias or framing effects. Finally, and most worryingly, our findings show that the substance of legal analysis varies with math skill for at least some subset of cases.

AB - Health and financial decision-making literatures have chronicled how people’s numerical abilities affect their decisions. Until now, however, there has been no empirical study of whether numeracy — or people’s ability to understand and use numbers — also interacts with legal decision making. This Article presents the first such study, and describes three original findings related to the role of numeracy in legal decision making. First, the study shows a surprisingly high level of math skill among law students, especially given the common folk wisdom that lawyers are bad at math. Second, although prior research in non-legal contexts has shown that people with low numeracy are particularly susceptible to cognitive bias, we detect no significant relationship between law students’ math skills and their susceptibility to bias or framing effects. Finally, and most worryingly, our findings show that the substance of legal analysis varies with math skill for at least some subset of cases.

KW - Numeracy

KW - math skill

KW - legal decisionmaking

KW - Law and psychology

KW - Decision making

KW - attorney or lawyer error

KW - perception of risk

KW - empirical legal studies

KW - inefficient precautions

KW - Hand formula

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 191

EP - 230

JO - Arizona State Law Journal

JF - Arizona State Law Journal

SN - 0164-4297

IS - 1

ER -